this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
683 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

69865 readers
2883 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tesla has confirmed it has given up on plans to make a Cybertruck range extender to achieve the range it originally promised on the electric pickup truck.

It started refunding deposits for the $16,000 extra battery pack.

When Tesla unveiled the production version of the Cybertruck in late 2023, two main disappointments were the price and the range.

The tri-motor version, the most popular in reservation tallies before production, was supposed to have over 500 miles of range and start at $70,000.

Tesla now sells the tri-motor Cybertruck for $100,000 and only has a range of 320 miles.

The dual-motor Cybertruck was supposed to cost $50,000 and have over 300 miles of range. In reality, it starts at $80,000 and has 325 miles of range.

Archive link: https://archive.is/CGbaE

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I believe the three motor versions is to add extra power under load to the rear wheels. (A weight/power/range compromise between the 4 and 2 motor versions).

The motors are essentially in line with the wheels (they have gearing but it's minimal and internal to the motor housing, not attached like an automatic transmission would be, if that makes sense.)

The "three motor" design is just the single motor design up front and the dual motor design in the back.

I'm not sure if they ever actually released the single motor version though.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

extra power under load to the rear wheels

Lol like there's enough room back there to add a load.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's supposed to tow. In theory.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 2 points 23 hours ago

I've seen arcade games built tougher than the interior of that POS lol

The load of getting this brick up to speed quickly so the driver can show off

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Basically they use the same size motor everywhere, and your total torque and power is dependent on how many you've got?

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

pretty much. I believe all the cars use the same motor except for the plaid versions (or maybe just the S plaid?) that has a different motor that's designed to hit higher rpm's

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

More power to the rear makes sense because you get more traction at the rear under normal acceleration, not just when carrying a load. It's pretty typical of electric cars to do this, just like it's typical to have bigger brakes on the front of all cars, because there's more traction at the front under braking.

There's also the issue of torque vectoring. Without a differential, torque vectoring is essential, but under acceleration torque vectoring to the rear wheels is much more effective than to the front wheels, so that's another reason to split the rear power but not the front.