Technology

59534 readers

3196 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

144

Computer scientist shows how to tamper with Georgia voting machine, in election security trial: “All it takes is five seconds and a Bic pen.” (www.ajc.com)

submitted 10 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Computer scientist shows how to tamper with Georgia voting machine, in election security trial: “All it takes is five seconds and a Bic pen.”::An expert witness for plaintiffs seeking to bar Georgia's touchscreen voting machines showed a crowded courtroom how he could tamper with election res

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] rowinxavier@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago (6 children)

In Australia we have a robust and fast paper voting system administered by the Australian Electoral Commission. We get most results in the evening of election day with only really close races being a couple of days out. There is solid chain of custody on paper ballots and having been used for over a century we have all the kinks worked out.

The USA has about 330 million people, we have about 25 million. The voting population of each is smaller, but it is a much larger percetage of our population due to compulsory voting. If we can do it with less than 10% of the population it could be done there with the same ratio no worries, just assume out country was a state and you can see it can work.

Paper is safe and secure. It is well understood and all the hack and hijinks have been worked out. If you ask experts in IT if they think voting should be dine electronically they answer hell no without much debate.

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Ditto in the UK 50 million people putting crosses on paper with pens in one day. First results come in about 2 hours after the close of the polls at 10pm, 95% done by the time you wake up the next day. Electronic voting has plenty of downsides and no upsides for anyone other than the people making the voting machines.

[–] Pheonixtail@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Am an IT professional (and also happen to have a degree in politics, i've had a weird life), can confirm.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I am an IT professional, and yep computers should not do election voting

[–] xavier666@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago

Electronic voting for deciding a conference/meeting venue is fine, but anything involving governance over a large body of people is a strict no-no.

Reason: if other nation states are interested in tampering with the election, they can easily do it with the amount of resources they have. Paper vote is a distributed system which is very hard to tamper AT SCALE.

[–] RIPandTERROR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 months ago

IT professional:

If I had my way we would all use paper and pen

[–] jnplch@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 10 months ago

Germany uses paper ballots. 60 million eligible voters, 3/4 actually voted during the last federal elections.

[–] Pheonixtail@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Am an IT professional (and also happen to have a degree in politics, i've had a weird life), can confirm.