Technology

73139 readers

3731 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

L4s@hackingne.ws

722

Brave browser blocks Windows feature that takes screenshots of everything you do on your PC (www.neowin.net)

submitted 2 days ago by moe90@feddit.nl to c/technology@lemmy.world

374 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] Engywuck@lemmy.zip -13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Actually, I consider Brave the best (or the least bed...) browser on the market. Period. The fact that it isn't made by Mozilla is a plus for me.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don't like Mozilla either, but here are my priorities in a web browser:

FOSS
Privacy tools - includes ad blocking; I'd actually be okay with ads if they didn't track me
Promotes open web standards - rendering engine diversity is critical here, I don't want a repeat of the IE era
Security
Performance

Firefox ticks all of them, and my issues with Mozilla as an org don't really come into play. I use a fork on my phone, but I use Firefox on my laptop and desktop because I trust the binaries coming from my Linux distribution maintainers (part of 4).

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good for you. I actively refuse to use it or any of its derivatives to avoid endorsing Mozilla by giving them market share. Additionally, I find that Brave just performs better (and needs one extension less to be functional).

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I care a lot about rendering engine diversity, and Firefox is the largest non-chromium browser, so I use it. It's fast enough for me, and my handful of extensions gives me what I need.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Again, good for you.

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Brave also ticks all of them?

at this point, Firefox's development is not very much more open than Chromium's

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It doesn't tick #3, hence why I use a Firefox browser as my main. If they had their own rendering engine, I would consider it as my main. But for now, it's my backup in case I need a website that doesn't work on Firefox (i.e. they use something Chrome-specific).

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 1 points 1 day ago

Valid point then. We need compatibility with gecko, I always found it better looking than chromium