this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
286 points (91.1% liked)

Technology

73379 readers
4180 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

To me, it seems like they are arguing that "testing" whether a hammer can smash your thumb doesn't actually provide any useful information on the safety of a hammer.

To me, it seems they are saying that Estwing makes a better hammer than Fischer-Price, even though the Fischer-Price hammer is far less likely to cause injury if you hit your thumb.

All this article says is that we shouldn't give a toddler a real hammer, and we shouldn't stuff a general purpose LLM like ChatGPT into a Tickle-Me-Elmo.