this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
523 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

73423 readers
4364 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Source.

Long Response

I would like to thank all those who signed the petition. It is right that the regulatory regime for in scope online services takes a proportionate approach, balancing the protection of users from online harm with the ability for low-risk services to operate effectively and provide benefits to users.

The Government has no plans to repeal the Online Safety Act, and is working closely with Ofcom to implement the Act as quickly and effectively as possible to enable UK users to benefit from its protections.

Proportionality is a core principle of the Act and is in-built into its duties. As regulator for the online safety regime, Ofcom must consider the size and risk level of different types and kinds of services when recommending steps providers can take to comply with requirements. Duties in the Communications Act 2003 require Ofcom to act with proportionality and target action only where it is needed.

Some duties apply to all user-to-user and search services in scope of the Act. This includes risk assessments, including determining if children are likely to access the service and, if so, assessing the risks of harm to children. While many services carry low risks of harm, the risk assessment duties are key to ensuring that risky services of all sizes do not slip through the net of regulation. For example, the Government is very concerned about small platforms that host harmful content, such as forums dedicated to encouraging suicide or self-harm. Exempting small services from the Act would mean that services like these forums would not be subject to the Act’s enforcement powers. Even forums that might seem harmless carry potential risks, such as where adults come into contact with child users.

Once providers have carried out their duties to conduct risk assessments, they must protect the users of their service from the identified risks of harm. Ofcom’s illegal content Codes of Practice set out recommended measures to help providers comply with these obligations, measures that are tailored in relation to both size and risk. If a provider’s risk assessment accurately determines that the risks faced by users are low across all harms, Ofcom’s Codes specify that they only need some basic measures, including:

  • easy-to-find, understandable terms and conditions;
  • a complaints tool that allows users to report illegal material when they see it, backed up by a process to deal with those complaints;
  • the ability to review content and take it down if it is illegal (or breaches their terms of service);
  • a specific individual responsible for compliance, who Ofcom can contact if needed.

Where a children's access assessment indicates a platform is likely to be accessed by children, a subsequent risk assessment must be conducted to identify measures for mitigating risks. Like the Codes of Practice on illegal content, Ofcom’s recently issued child safety Codes also tailor recommendations based on risk level. For example, highly effective age assurance is recommended for services likely accessed by children that do not already prohibit and remove harmful content such as pornography and suicide promotion. Providers of services likely to be accessed by UK children were required to complete their assessment, which Ofcom may request, by 24 July.

On 8 July, Ofcom’s CEO wrote to the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology noting Ofcom’s responsibility for regulating a wide range of highly diverse services, including those run by businesses, but also charities, community and voluntary groups, individuals, and many services that have not been regulated before.

The letter notes that the Act’s aim is not to penalise small, low-risk services trying to comply in good faith. Ofcom – and the Government – recognise that many small services are dynamic small businesses supporting innovation and offer significant value to their communities. Ofcom will take a sensible approach to enforcement with smaller services that present low risk to UK users, only taking action where it is proportionate and appropriate, and will focus on cases where the risk and impact of harm is highest.

Ofcom has developed an extensive programme of work designed to support a smoother journey to compliance, particularly for smaller firms. This has been underpinned by interviews, workshops and research with a diverse range of online services to ensure the tools meet the needs of different types of services. Ofcom’s letter notes its ‘guide for services’ guidance and tools hub, and its participation in events run by other organisations and networks including those for people running small services, as well as its commitment to review and improve materials and tools to help support services to create a safer life online.

The Government will continue to work with Ofcom towards the full implementation of the Online Safety Act 2023, including monitoring proportionate implementation.

Department for Science, Innovation and Technology

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stinerman@midwest.social 75 points 2 days ago (3 children)

As an American, I'm worried that Starmer's legacy is going to be giving you PM Nigel Farage.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Yall really need a real labor party. I mean so do us yanks, but y'all do too

[–] Coldcell@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago

Just as you can see happened with Mamdani, any genuine left candidate in the UK (Corbin) gets smeared and fought even by their own side. Whenever these candidates come out it shows that the 2 party system is an illusion, and all those in power seek to profit and rule.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hope he can overtake reform in popularity

[–] oppy1984@lemdro.id 2 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I mean he could just make the platform "we'll unblock the porn" and nothing else and win a majority in the first election.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

That might just work.

[–] Twig@sopuli.xyz 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I feel as if we're at that Scrubs reference

[–] oppy1984@lemdro.id 1 points 9 hours ago

It wasn't a direct reference, but definitely inspired by Dr. cox.

[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think you can include all G20 states there.

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

France has real, relevant leftwing parties, not sure about most of the others, though

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Starmer is no where near Blair 2.0, Blair at least had charisma, a political plan and, at least before Iraq, genuinly had mass grass roots support. Starmer has none of them, he's an apolitical middle maneger who has been pushed to the top of the party by a right wing clique in labour as a way to purge the left.

[–] OwlPaste@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

It is a very high possibility, most likely not next election but certainly one after that is a likely candidate.

[–] Coldcell@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Like Biden's legacy is fumbling the 2nd term so the US got Trump 2.0?