this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
444 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

76008 readers
4081 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
444
This CEO laid off nearly 80% of his staff because they refused to adopt AI fast enough. 2 years later, he says he’d do it again (fortune.com)
submitted 1 month ago by themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
116 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 64 points 1 month ago (5 children)

"Vaughan was surprised to find it was often the technical staff, not marketing or sales, who dug in their heels."

So the people that understood it best were sceptical, and this didn't give him pause.

Can someone explain to me why all these empty suits dick ride LLMs so hard?

[–] Benaaasaaas@group.lt 38 points 1 month ago

Because they try the tools, realize that their job is pretty much covered by LLMs and think it's the same for everyone.

[–] MysteriousSophon21@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Technical staff were skeptical because they actually know what AI can and can't do reliably in production environments - it's good at generating content but terrible at logical reasoning and mission-critical tasks that require consistancy.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 11 points 1 month ago

So it's the CEO they should replace.

[–] end_stage_ligma@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

it’s good at generating content but terrible at logical reasoning and mission-critical tasks that require consistency.

Thank goodness nobody is crusading to have AI take over medicine.

[–] medem@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 month ago

...which is why I categorically refuse to use the term Artificial intelligence .

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

They're easily conned and they love yes men.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Can someone explain to me why all these empty suits dick ride LLMs so hard?

$$$$$$$

AIs are cheaper than humans.

[–] It_Is1_24PM@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Cheaper NOW, when OpenAI operates at huge loss

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 1 month ago

Not really. Because they don't work and then they have to hire more humans which is more expensive than just keeping them on for the 6 months it'll take for the CEOs to realise that.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

The bullshitters were quick to adopt the bullshit factory.