this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
746 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

74292 readers
5245 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iridebikes@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not secure either. The next world war will involve efforts to sabotage satellites.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's the point. Musk wants control over the entire internet.

If all the other internet infrastructure was abandoned, he would be the most powerful person in history. Want to regulate him afterwards? He could just shut down the internet in your region until you accept his terms.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Musk wants control over the entire internet.

This is the number one reason my friend and I refused to even consider StarLink. We don't live in the US and do not want all our traffic going through there.

[–] iridebikes@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

He has already meddled in the Ukraine war doing things like this, too. He turned off Starlink during an offensive Ukrainian mission. He claims he had to because civilian systems aren't allowed to be used for a foreign incursion into Russia and that he'd face consequences. Which is a complete lie.