this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
11 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45719 readers
1057 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TankieCatgirl@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I love that y'all use that as an insult. It only carries any weight in your own echo chamber, you know that right? No where else on the planet (be it a forum or a physical space) does that mean anything. Well, maybe within north korea

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If "on the planet" you mean primarily the U.S and secondarily the rest of the "west" while excluding the majority of humanity on the planet, then sure.

You're so brainwashed and conditioned into believing you have more in common with some ghoul billionaire that values your life insofar as much as they can extract wealth out of you than your own fellow worker.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Obligatory comment that brainwashing is a myth rooted in orientalism and later pseudoscience, propagated by the US in order to make excuses for US soldiers defecting during the Korean War (et al).

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I mean everywhere that isn't China or Russia or one of their satellites/annexes yeah.

Not sure where you got the billionaire thing, I've never defended them, in word or action. (Living in a capitalist country and needing a job for resources doesn't make me a billionaire apologist)

Liberalism and billionaire worship are not the same thing, same as communism and xi are not the same thing.

To be clear: just because xi figuratively leads a communist country doesn't mean this policy is perfectly communist.

Same thing goes for billionaires existing in a liberal society.

Lastly, the existence of either doesn't invalidate the tenets of either ideology

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

None of that makes any sense

[–] Thedogspaw@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Xi is no different than any other billionaire shit head most of the communist party top leaders use there position to gain control over the state controlled businesses

[–] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The cia literally called him redder than red and unable to be corrupted by money lmao

https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09BEIJING3128_a.html

[–] captcha@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Xi first started geting so much hate from the west because he actually started purging communist party members for being too involved in the private sector. If he was encouraging the bourgeoisification of the CPC he would be hailed by the west.

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tell me you know nothing about the PRC without saying you know nothing about the PRC

[–] Thedogspaw@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure dude xi is such a great leader real humanitarian bro I've read more about that scumbag than you will ever know

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sure you've read plenty of propaganda

[–] Thedogspaw@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your right no propaganda in china from the state controlled no independent media allowed

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You think corporate controled media is better?

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago

This is incoherent. Xi has administrative control (or influence) over state enterprises, but he isn't getting profits or stock options from them, so there are no grounds for calling him a billionaire

communist party top leaders use there position to gain control over the state controlled businesses

This is like saying you became a police commissioner to gain control over local police cars. Yeah, an explicit part of your job is that you can direct them, but the claim is so tautological that it looks like you are saying something else. It's not like Xi will retain control of these enterprises after he leaves office.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Of course you agree on something that's bullshit about an AES

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That must be why you felt the need to respond to it.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a message board, where we reply to each other.

By your approach: why did you feel the need to defend him? See? Silly.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is a meesage board, where we reply to each other

stupidpol