this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2025
419 points (84.2% liked)

Technology

76008 readers
2851 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
419
Framework supporting far-right racists? (community.frame.work)
submitted 5 days ago by pegazz@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
450 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Title of the (concerning) thread on their community forum, not voluntary clickbait. Came across the thread thanks to a toot by @Khrys@mamot.fr (French speaking)

The gist of the issue raised by OP is that framework sponsors and promotes projects lead by known toxic and racists people (DHH among them).

I agree with the point made by the OP :

The “big tent” argument works fine if everyone plays by some basic civil rules of understanding. Stuff like code of conducts, moderation, anti-racism, surely those things we agree on? A big tent won’t work if you let in people that want to exterminate the others.

I'm disappointed in framework's answer so far

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What do I expect them to think? "Trump was a shit president last time, why would I give him another shot"

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To the average voter who doesn't follow things very closely, the options were basically:

  • bad, but the same as the previous admin, which did stuff that negatively impacted me
  • bad, but different; the last time they were in office, they didn't do things that impacted me too much

Unfortunately, far too many people blame the economy on the sitting President, when they often have little influence on it. Trump was president during an economic boom, and got out just as COVID was going. Biden was president through COVID, and by all accounts was incapable of the job during at least part of his term. What do you expect the average person to do who doesn't follow politics closely but catches bits and pieces closer to the election? Of course they'll go with the person promising change over the person promising the status quo...

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Ok maga, I give up talking to you

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

Maga? Really? I was very vocal about voting against him in all three elections.

I'm not saying Trump was the better candidate. I'm merely saying Harris ran a poor, tone-deaf campaign.