this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2025
422 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

76435 readers
3596 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We need more cloud services.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mspencer712@programming.dev 34 points 1 day ago (5 children)

We also need more individuals paying for “business” Internet connections at home. We need self-hosters to be able to feel comfortable running public services from their homes. And so we need a set of practices and recipes to follow, so a self-hoster can feel confident that, if one thing gets broken into, the other few dozen things they’re hosting will stay safe.

The “family nerd” hosting things for the family needs to be a thing again. Sorry, friends, I know family tech support sucks. It’ll suck so much more when it’s a web site down and nobody can reach their kid’s softball team page, and there’s a game next weekend, etc. But we’ve seen what happens when we abdicate our responsibilities and let for-profit companies handle it for us.

(I wish so hard that I had a solution ready, a corporate LAN in a box, that someone can just install and use. I’m working on something, but I’m pretty sure I over-complicated it. It doesn’t need to be Fort Knox, it just needs to be pretty good. And I suck at ops stuff.)

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 day ago (6 children)

We need more places offering the same upload as download so people can do these things from home. Here I know spectrum only offers like 10mb upload even if you’ve got like 3gb download.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

It's not only upload (I'm so lucky living in France) but CORS, DNS and other stuff that de-decentralise things IMO.

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm so tired of my 40Mbps upload speeds. Why can I get 1.2Tbps down, but only 40Mbps up? It's crazy.

[–] mangaskahn@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because that's literally the minimum upload speed they can give you. If you're pulling down data at 1.2Gbps, you'll be sending back 40Mbps in response traffic. If they could give you less, they would.

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I actually only go for the 400Mbps down plan, and it's 40Mbps up across all of their plans, including the 1.2Tbps plan. I believe it's some outdated hardware limitation of cable or something, at least that's what I've heard.

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

It's not just speed, CGNAT is a near complete "fuck you" to self-hosting. You can work around it with a VPN endpoint "in the cloud", but that still means you are reliant on someone else's computer.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

At least where I'm at, Spectrum also blocks a lot of ports. Can't even use FTP!

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

You need a new modem that supports the higher upload speed protocol. And having a DOCSIS 3.1 isn't enough... it has to be a DOCSIS 3.1 that supports the new protocols. I had to switch to a Hitron CODA because my Netgear CM1000 wasn't enough anymore

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The last time I looked at bus internet for my location, they wanted 3x the price for 2/3 the speed. At my actual job 20m away, I have the same provider and a business acct. Same downtime, same equipment, only unlock port 80 and 443.

[–] mspencer712@programming.dev 2 points 15 hours ago

You’re right to be frustrated. Mine is the same way. It’s ok to be passionate about that, and to value punishing greedy ISPs by not paying extra for a business account. (In many cases you could even need both, if you might worry about occasional denial of service attacks and need to be sure attackers can’t also knock out your ability to work from home, for example.)

I think there’s a compelling argument in favor of protecting diversity of hosting and preventing a monoculture or a monopoly. It’s not super compelling, but it’s out there.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Maybe with symmetric fiber and if the electricity prices lower I’ll go back to that. Before the advent of convenient and cheap providers we had ou webservers, irc servers and some game servers at home… but the cost of that and the additional maintenance nightmare makes that less desirable than having OVH doing it all for me…

[–] 0tan0d@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Homes should come with a static IP address.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Even just ipv6 would be nice so that we don't need NAT

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Tell me more about your thing!

I'm working on a decentralised sharing protocol, and I'd love getting likeminded people together.