this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2025
499 points (92.2% liked)

Technology

76435 readers
3596 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new study published in Nature by University of Cambridge researchers just dropped a pixelated bomb on the entire Ultra-HD market, but as anyone with myopia can tell you, if you take your glasses off, even SD still looks pretty good :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This is so much bullshit. 4K does make a difference, specially if playing console games on a large TV (65" and up).

[–] richardwallass@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago

Agree they did the test with a 44 inch. That's why they got this result.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Console games that all run at <720p getting upscaled to hell and back. We have come so far since the PS3 where games ran at <720p, but without upscaling. lol

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 23 hours ago

Yeah, my PS5 games are definitely not 720p

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you're sitting 3' from the screen, sure. Even 8K is better, if your hardware can drive it.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Let's agree to disagree. I can see the difference at a distance of 6', and I wear glasses.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Can you see the difference without your glasses?

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Not as much, but yes. However, it may be because now I'm actively looking for the difference after this thread, hehe.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah... we have a 55" 4K tv, and from across the room you sort of have to squint to tell the difference between 4K and 1080p, up close sure, but I don't watch screens that big from that close.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Next year, when our house construction is completed, I need to choose 2 new TVs, an 85 and a 65. At this point I'm looking for longevity more than all the marketing sticker BS being pushed now. I will probably go with a couple of Scepter non-smart TVs and just keep running my media from Jellyfin with a couple of NUCs attached to them, hehe.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 9 hours ago

The closest thing to "Smart TVs" in our home are Blu-Ray players, and they've never been network connected.

I like the ViewSonics we have, and we've had a series of NUCs over the years, but lately I'm finding that the N100/N150 fanless PCs like this are perfectly capable of HTPC duty: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CWV439YW