Technology

59569 readers

3825 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

675

Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature (www.engadget.com)

submitted 9 months ago by d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world

147 comments fedilink hide all child comments

One of Google Search's oldest and best-known features, cache links, are being retired. Best known by the "Cached" button, those are a snapshot of a web page the last time Google indexed it. However, according to Google, they're no longer required.

"It was meant for helping people access pages when way back, you often couldn’t depend on a page loading,” Google's Danny Sullivan wrote. “These days, things have greatly improved. So, it was decided to retire it."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

JFC...at this point I may as well stand up a self hosted search engine.

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Is this really such an essential feature when archive.today exists?

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not really but I'm disgusted with the continual downgrading of Google Search and it's hyper-focus on increasing profitability at the cost of user experience and data privacy.

I was already toying with searXNG anyway, so it's not a big leap.

[–] DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A few months back Ruud stood up a copy: https://searxng.world/

I've been using it, and it tends to be as good as or better than google's search. There's only been a handful of instances where I've explicitly used google's.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Thanks, I'll give it a try. I've been using https://searx.work/ to play with the tech and I'm almost satisfied enough to stand up my own instance.

Edit; I removed my dumb-assery around default search engines.