this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
1154 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

79476 readers
4498 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As evidence, the lawsuit cites unnamed "courageous whistleblowers" who allege that WhatsApp and Meta employees can request to view a user's messages through a simple process, thus bypassing the app's end-to-end encryption. "A worker need only send a 'task' (i.e., request via Meta's internal system) to a Meta engineer with an explanation that they need access to WhatsApp messages for their job," the lawsuit claims. "The Meta engineering team will then grant access -- often without any scrutiny at all -- and the worker's workstation will then have a new window or widget available that can pull up any WhatsApp user's messages based on the user's User ID number, which is unique to a user but identical across all Meta products."

"Once the Meta worker has this access, they can read users' messages by opening the widget; no separate decryption step is required," the 51-page complaint adds. "The WhatsApp messages appear in widgets commingled with widgets containing messages from unencrypted sources. Messages appear almost as soon as they are communicated -- essentially, in real-time. Moreover, access is unlimited in temporal scope, with Meta workers able to access messages from the time users first activated their accounts, including those messages users believe they have deleted." The lawsuit does not provide any technical details to back up the rather sensational claims.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 112 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well if I can't trust Meta with my information, who CAN I trust

[–] chemicalprophet@slrpnk.net 54 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] usernameusername@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Oh okay. My location is 55.752121, 37.617664, my full name is Jeremy, and my password is hunter9. I trust you not to tell this to anybody

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 39 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] usernameusername@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh god damnit chemicalprofet why did you tell this guy i thougjt i could trust you :((

[–] bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

All I see is '••••••'

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 4 points 18 hours ago

I see '******' though.
Maybe it's just a different interface.

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Jeremy "Iks" Hunter IX

Edit: IX. Iks. I think we got it right now.

[–] ADTJ@feddit.uk 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 18 hours ago

Pronounced "iks"

Just like Cher (which is short for Cheremy).

[–] hayvan@piefed.world 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Nice to see the ancient lore alive.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Your secret is safe with us and our 36,893 affiliates.

[–] Buffy@libretechni.ca 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can confirm, chemicalprophet is the best password manager I've ever used.

[–] chemicalprophet@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 day ago

Ah! You did your own research!

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

The drunk dude that's always sitting on the ground near the park entrance and sell weird tissue dolls with curly hairs is more trustworthy, I'd say.