this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
413 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

79476 readers
4653 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Police officers are being told to “be as vague as permissible” about why they are using the Flock surveillance system in order to not leak sensitive information via public records requests, according to records obtained using a public records request. The warning originated from a Houston-area police intelligence center that includes members of the FBI and ICE and suggests without evidence that people are using a website called HaveIBeenFlocked.com to “potentially retaliate against law enforcement.”

The warnings were shared with 404 Media by researchers from Southerners Against Surveillance Systems and Infrastructure and Lucy Parsons Lab after our article about police unwittingly leaking the details of millions of surveillance targets nationwide due to public records redaction errors made by several Flock automated license plate reader system customers. This data was aggregated into a searchable tool called HaveIBeenFlocked.

Rather than looking at this incident as a huge operational security failure associated with using a massive commercial surveillance system, police see this as something that puts their officers directly in harm’s way. The data released by police departments includes the agency doing a search, the officer’s name, time of search, the license plate searched, and a “reason” field, which is the justification for doing a specific search.

Archive: http://archive.today/DtKt4

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hector@lemmy.today 5 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

I wonder if lasers ruin them like older cameras?

[–] EchoCranium@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 hours ago

Infrared lasers used in lidar systems will damage phone cameras, so likely will fry surveillance cameras as well. You can buy 1550nm lasers used as illuminators for night vision systems. Probably want a Class 2 or 3.

https://www.techeblog.com/lidar-smartphone-camera-sensor-damage/

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Bullet through the battery should be pretty effective. Surely they are lithium batteries. They catch fire if they get a hole in 'em.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 5 points 5 hours ago

I was just thinking the laser thing could be something they may not be able to identify the cause of, a bullet they would know someone shot it. Which is probably ok if you are smart about doing one, but if you want to do all of them, something sneaky would be better.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

If you get a big enough laser, anything is possible.