this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2026
312 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

80916 readers
3894 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lawyers for a now-20-year-old woman are arguing that addictive features harmed her mental health in opening statements in a landmark trial against Meta and YouTube, the first of hundreds of similar cases to go to trial.

The plaintiff — identified by her first name, Kaley, or her initials, KGM — and her mother accused the tech companies of intentionally creating addictive platforms that caused her to develop anxiety, body dysmorphia and suicidal thoughts. Lawyers for Meta and YouTube have indicated they will argue that a difficult family life, not social media, was responsible for her mental health challenges.

Speaking on Monday in front of a jury in state court in Los Angeles, Kaley’s lawyer Mark Lanier called social media apps like YouTube and Instagram “digital casinos,” saying the app’s “endless scroll feature” creates dopamine hits that can lead to addiction.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

This is the modern version of the Judas Priest backwards masking case.

[–] nyctre@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago

How so? These companies are actively trying to make their platforms addictive. And it's pretty well established at this point that social media is harmful to mental health, is it not? It's a society and parenting issue as well, obviously, but that doesn't mean these companies shouldn't be regulated.

The Judas case was complete bullshit, however. The message was "do it", wasn't it? So even if it had been a purposeful subliminal message, it's like saying Nike's slogan is harmful. It's silly.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 5 hours ago

"What's the Ozman trying to say here, Nicky?"

"John, absolutely nothing. The blizzard always came straight with his messages. But wrap your minds around this, gentleman. Chicago."

I command you in the name of Lucifer to spread the blood of the innocent!

"Whoa! Chicago kicks ass!"