this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
1586 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

81026 readers
7519 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] artyom@piefed.social -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not, but that doesn't make your argument any more sensible.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah, so maybe shitty parents isn't a good enough reason to let a company monetize and eventually lose your PII to the dark web?

[–] artyom@piefed.social -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Okay. Cool that's what I said too. Just... the way you said it sounded like you were advocating for using bad parenting as a pretext for massive breaches of privacy and identity security.

[–] artyom@piefed.social -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The way you said it sounded like you were advocating for parents to watch their kids every second of every day, and if they don't then whatever happens is their fault.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If your child steals a car, are you allowed to say "I can't watch my kids all time time" and get off consequence free?

Of course not. Do I think it is realistic for parents to keep an eye on their kid 100% of the time, of course not... But, I do expect that parents raise their kids in a progressively less restrictive manner and provide access to more autonomy as the child mautures? Absolutely, and I don't think it is unreasonable to extend that progressive loosening of the parental leash in the real world to children on the internet. You shouldn't have to watch your kids all the time on the internet, if they are old enough and mature enough to be on there unsupervised. If they aren't ready for unsupervised access to the internet, then you shouldn't allow it.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

If your child steals a car, are you allowed to say "I can't watch my kids all time time" and get off consequence free? Of course not. Do I think it is realistic for parents to keep an eye on their kid 100% of the time, of course not.

I don't understand how you reconcile these 2 statements. They can't watch their kids 100% but also if the kid does something illegal, it's their responsibility? You can raise your kids to do whatever you want but they often do not listen.

If they aren't ready for unsupervised access to the internet, then you shouldn't allow it.

Good luck telling your kids they can't get on the internet. Remember you can't watch them all day.

Point is, if the parents are irresponsible, then who does it hurt? The parents? No. It hurts the children, and it hurts the rest of society.

Your same argument can be used to abolish any sort of legal protections for children like gambling, driving, smoking, drinking, tattoos, etc. Everything should be the parents' responsibility, right?

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t understand how you reconcile these 2 statements. They can’t watch their kids 100% but also if the kid does something illegal, it’s their responsibility?

The reconsoliation is that as a parent, you are responsible/accountable for the actions of your child at all times, whether you are watching them or not. It's part of being a parent. Raising your children not to be little sociopaths who can eventually be trusted as adults, is a major part of parenting.

Let me ask you: Should parents be responsible for damage done by their child?

I'm not really expecting yes/no to that answer, so feel free to elaborate on it

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

you are responsible/accountable for the actions of your child at all times, whether you are watching them or not. It's part of being a parent.

Criminally liable? That's insane.

Raising your children not to be little sociopaths who can eventually be trusted as adults, is a major part of parenting.

Parents have limited control of that. Children are not remote controlled robots, they're their own people, and some of them are shit, no matter what you do.

Let me ask you: Should parents be responsible for damage done by their child?

If you can demonstrate a pattern of bad parenting, sure.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

If you can demonstrate a pattern of bad parenting, sure.

So, if a teen takes their mom's keys, and drives her car into your parked car, should you be on the hook for the damages to your vehicle? Should you be on the hook for the damages to her vehicle? Especially if it's a first time offense?

[–] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

My answer to your question is on your comment.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Gotcha. So if it is the first time, or maybe the second time, fuck you, pay for the damage someone else did to your car and their own car. Maybe on the 4th or 5th time, we can start getting the teen's parents to pay for it?

[–] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 1 hour ago

Welcome to life bro. Shit happens.