this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
108 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

82250 readers
3984 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On January 14, 2026, global telnet traffic observed by GreyNoise sensors fell off a cliff. A 59% sustained reduction, eighteen ASNs going completely silent, five countries vanishing from our data entirely. Six days later, CVE-2026-24061 dropped. Coincidence is one explanation.

The pattern points toward one or more North American Tier 1 transit providers implementing port 23 filtering

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 31 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

But telnet is just a bidirectional TCP connection. You can run any terminal emulation you want over it, and run it on any port you want.

The telnetd service on the other hand… that has no reason to still be internet-facing.

[–] dparticiple@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Good point. I was referring more to telnetd as an unencrypted client-server protocol, typically to port 23. Often unauthenticated, ripe for MITM attacks.

That needs to end.

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

Hopefully nobody uses it for actual remote system access anymore, but it's still a great protocol (well... "great" with some caveats) for things like MUDs and BBSes and other toys. I'm pretty sure you can even use it for IRC or IMAP or HTTP if you know what you're doing. Is it secure? Of course not. That's why we use modern protocols using SSL or TLS when we need security. But we don't always need security.

Sure, telnet is not secure. But neither is, say, Minecraft. Because it's a game. It's not that important and in some ways it's actually frustrating. There are pros and cons. It sucks if people are cheating or you get griefed or you get your account hacked or some other shit hacked, oh well, it's a game, all you need to do is go outside and touch some grass about it. Not everything in life needs to be bank-vault secure. Sometimes it's fun to just play around with raw text that doesn't have ironclad security rules and certificates and key renegotiation guardrails built around it. Just go spew some text at some other protocol and see what it says. It's fun and educational. I love telnet.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I used to debug POP3 issues by going through sessions one line at a time via telnet. Occasionally HTTP sessions too.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

I used to send messages by hand over SMTP using a telnet client.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Any reason to pick that over netcat though?

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

These days, not really, except that netcat has wider capabilities and so often triggers security alarms when used.