this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
850 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

81709 readers
4236 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 64 points 2 days ago (15 children)

Going to be fucking hilarious when all the western companies get fucked by China taking over the market they don't seem to care about.

[–] jali67@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They’re wealthy but absolute fucking morons. The people who fall for the “they have money so they must be smart” are such gullible buffoons. CCP is much more competent than American oligarchs, running what could’ve been great with better policy into the ground.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's almost as if socialism makes for a better capitalistic system. It's a lot better when the oligarchs fear the government rather than the government fearing the oligarchs.

[–] jali67@lemmy.zip 1 points 23 hours ago
[–] SalaciousBCrumb@lemy.lol 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Hmm I know China has a big push for AI as well, I wonder what their market is looking like.

Edit: https://www.chinatalk.media/p/how-much-ai-does-1-get-you-in-china Ah seems like their AI isn't as big due to lack of access to western chips.

[–] isaacblach@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Don't count on China. They are going to invade Taiwan next year and the global trade embargo will be a rounding error to the destruction of the tmsc factories during that war. Or they will capture the fabs and prohibit export to the US. Loose loose for us.

[–] thethrilloftime69@feddit.online 17 points 2 days ago (5 children)

"China, a country that hasn't invaded another country in 50 years, is going to invade this country" said the country that invades a country once a decade.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (5 children)

China claiming Taiwan is its territory and threatening invasion, the regular military "training exercises", even including the specific goal of Taiwan landing operations, and continuous hybrid attacks for years already, like invasion of Taiwan waters with fishing vessels, and cyber attacks, and you're sitting here claiming China isn't a country that would invade others. What do you make of these kinds of activities, then?

The what-aboutism deflection doesn't work very well on an international comment section, either.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] jali67@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

The issue is not black and white like you people that barely got by high school make it out.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

China a country that has been trying to unify Taiwan since the civil war they couldn’t quite finish.

[–] thethrilloftime69@feddit.online 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

When you live in the imperial core of one of the most militaristic nations in the history of the world, everything seems like a provocation.

[–] jali67@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ironic considering much of the world was constantly in conflict prior to Pax Americana.

[–] thethrilloftime69@feddit.online 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

America has engaged in war the majority of the post world war 2 era. Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan twice, Iraq twice. And that's not including all the proxy wars they've funded.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Don’t forget Africa!

[–] jali67@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes every instance was totally bad. The U.S. should’ve done nothing to counter USSR and their dominoes across the world. US should’ve just let every country fall into an authoritarian USSR influenced country.

Obviously, I don’t blindly think every war was good, such as Bush era Iraq. However, defending Kuwait was 100% defensible in Gulf War.

[–] thethrilloftime69@feddit.online 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The point I'm trying to make is America likes war a lot. China hasn't fought a war in 50 years. It's hard to take Americans seriously when they accuse someone of being aggressive.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

China spent 250 billion US dollars on defense last year. Clearly that’s for nothing.

[–] thethrilloftime69@feddit.online 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The way the US centric world works, you kinda have to, or you risk inviting the US trying to spread "freedom"

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Oh I thought it was to project power and pursue territory disputes. Building islands in neighboring nations waters and stuff. Flying jets over the Philippines and such.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

China spends so much on its military and miltech. Why is that again?

[–] jali67@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The US has solo hegemony and super power status that has been challenged but never overtaken. US/NATO (for what’s left of it) is the strongest alliance on the planet. My point is other countries are generally hesitant to start conflict due to US policing and involvement.

And the conflicts that do happen, happen at the behest the US and in the interest of US corporations. And the US has control over the narrative surrounding the conflict.

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (6 children)

yes, because what happened in the past can perfectly predict what's going to happen next.

not saying you are definitely wrong, but if someone wants to have a bet i wouldn't bet on the side of China not invading.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 16 points 2 days ago

They've been going to invade Taiwan next year for the last 30 years

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 6 points 2 days ago

If they do it Trump strikes “a deal” to give them Taiwan. That’s my bet.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

I don't understand this thing about anyone destroying those factories for any reason. I don't think that would happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

AI is the last great bubble.

And it, like all bubbles, will pop.

You are already seeing the people in the know flee the field.

You see reports that every company that has adopted it has at best changed nothing, at worst lost money on it.

Outside of the psychotic linked in CEO bubble, literally no one wants AI. And every day its generating more and more hate due to its halucinations, mistakes, and bullshit.

Its garnering massive negative attention for its use, and for anyone stupid enough to adopt it at this point (cough intel cough)

Its a dying star, and people are frantically trying to harvest the last bits of warmth from it before going off in search of new horizons.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I can only assume you haven't used it for anything it's good at lately. The truth is somewhere in the middle. Just like we still have websites after the dot com bubble, there will still be LLMs after the AI bubble pops.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The only stories I’ve ever heard of involving AI are told by people who, once again, are unable to see how their increase in productivity is not being met with a reduction in work hours. Unless, or course, “reduction in work hours” means they are being shown the door so a different idiot can do kore work for the same amount of pay.

Why does everyone feel the need to do as much as possible as quickly as possible at all times of every single day? And why are most people I talk to using ChatGPT to replace Google searches so they don’t need to actually think?

We all need to slow the fuck down.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

worker productivity continues to climb ever higher, yet wages never grow with it.

take someone from the 1950s office and ask them to do the same amount of work that an officer worker today does, and they'd quit on the spot. especially since they'd be paid less today than they were in the 1950s as far as buying power goes.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

No, I dont use it.

I get enough hallucinations and blatant lies from biologicals, I don't need an AI erasing a mountain to consume the coal underneath to tell me made up bullshit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)