this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
707 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

81907 readers
7396 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Screenshot of this question was making the rounds last week. But this article covers testing against all the well-known models out there.

Also includes outtakes on the 'reasoning' models.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] melfie@lemy.lol 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Context engineering is one way to shift that balance. When you provide a model with structured examples, domain patterns, and relevant context at inference time, you give it information that can help override generic heuristics with task-specific reasoning.

So the chat bots getting it right consistently probably have it in their system prompt temporarily until they can be retrained with it incorporated into the training data. 😆

Edit:

Oh, I see the linked article is part of a marketing campaign to promote this company’s paid cloud service that has source available SDKs as a solution to the problem being outlined here:

Opper automatically finds the most relevant examples from your dataset for each new task. The right context, every time, without manual selection.

I can see where this approach might be helpful, but why is it necessary to pay them per API call as opposed to using an open source solution that runs locally (aside from the fact that it’s better for their monetization this way)? Good chance they’re running it through yet another LLM and charging API fees to cover their inference costs with a profit. What happens when that LLM returns the wrong example?

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago

There are models with open weights, and you can run those locally on your GPU. It can be a bit slower depending on model and GPU. For example, GLM has an open version, both full and pruned, but it's not the newest version. A bunch of image generation models have local versions too.