this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
1687 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

81933 readers
2966 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

California Attorney General Rob Bonta last night filed a request for a preliminary injunction in California’s existing case against Amazon for price fixing. Attorney General Bonta’s 2022 lawsuit alleged that the company stifled competition and caused increased prices across California through its anticompetitive policies in order to avoid competing on price with other retailers. New evidence paints a clearer and more shocking picture. The motion for a preliminary injunction comes after a robust discovery process where California uncovered evidence of countless interactions in which Amazon, vendors, and Amazon’s competitors agree to increase and fix the prices of products on other retail websites to bolster Amazon’s profits. Time and again, across years and product categories, Amazon has reached out to its vendors and instructed them to increase retail prices on competitors’ websites, threatening dire consequences if vendors do not comply. Vendors, bullied by Amazon’s overwhelming bargaining leverage and fearing punishment, comply — agreeing to raise prices on competitors’ websites (often with the awareness and cooperation of the competing retailer), or to remove products from competing websites altogether. Amazon’s goal is to insulate itself from price competition by preventing lower retail prices in the market at the expense of American consumers who are already struggling with a crisis of affordability.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I cannot express enough how angry I am that people still use amazon. Major cringe when friends tell me all the shit they buy on there. I used it 10 years ago a couple times, never once since then. Its shit, slave labor, and enriches billionaires. No one forces you to use it.

[–] toddestan@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I avoid Amazon as much as possible, though on occasion I've more or less had no other reasonable choice. But that's happened something like 4 times in the last 10 years or so.

The big problem with boycotting Amazon is that while it's easy enough to avoid buying from their online store as much as possible, AWS (Amazon Web Services) is pretty much unavoidable if you're using the modern internet.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

True, but its a start! We win not by everything at once. Small steps.

[–] Darcranium@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Once all the competitors are gone, they will increase the prices to absurd, heartless levels

Its always the plan. Walmart. Discord. They all do the exact same thing. Which is why we must resist.

[–] dejova281@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It’s cringe because it’s affordable and convenient? Whenever I buy something from there I always price compare online and it’s the cheapest hands-down. Some people don’t have the luxury of constantly considering geopolitics and large-scale repercussions when they’re just simply trying to get by.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It super depends on what you’re buying. Personally, I just go without in order to avoid them. The only things I ever buy from Amazon are things I cannot find anywhere else that I need to have, such as water filters for the lead pipes in Montréal.

We don’t have the luxury to ignore how bad Amazon is. Amazon is aware of this and does everything it can to force you to buy from them by under cutting other businesses until competition dries up. Every time I can buy something for a little bit more and skip Amazon that’s a huge a win for everyone from the original supplier, the more local store selling it, and the working class in general.

Edit: Reading and writing more comments, I’m gunna find a way to get those filters from elsewhere even if they cost a bunch more.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No bro water filters from Amazon are unethical, please expose yourself to lead because some guy on lemmy is virtue signaling /s

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

I cannot tell what side of the argument you’re trying to be on here, gunna be real hokest with ya.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure, but there's many people who are wealthy enough to make the choice and still use amazon because they dont know any better. And this is what happens.

[–] dejova281@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Understandable, perhaps one day I’ll be in that boat myself. Amazon has pissed me off in a few ways and I’m definitely looking for alternatives. Regardless of where I shop, I feel like my money is still going into the same greedy pockets unless it’s a local brick and mortar store.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Its true, but perfect is the enemy of good. If 10,000 people quit using amazon right now, that's a huge difference. And millions of people use it.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"some people don't have the luxury of considering whether their product is made from death camp body parts when they're just simply trying to get by"

(*) https://krakowtop.org/auschwitz-room-of-hair/

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Jesus H Fucking Christ. How about electing a government that will regulate Amazon instead of comparing poor people who need consumer goods to nazis. This is some tankie ass behavior

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You missed the point completely, so I'll lay it out for you: Everyone has to draw a line SOMEWHERE. And when a country whose government sends fascist death squads into the streets is supported by a company, there's a fuckton of lines to be drawn.

There's ZERO excuse for doing business with amazon. No one is starving because they can't shop there. So GTFO with your lazy ass morally corrupt exuses.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, these people saying they NEED amazon probably didn't live in ye olden days without internet. We survived then, you can survive now.

There's thousands if not millions of sellers all over the internet. People are lazy/dumb and just want to 1 click buy and are scared to go anywhere but amazon.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And then have the nerve to argue on behalf of "poor people" most of whom probably don't have any spare money to buy convenience products on amazon.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean Walmart wiped out every other store so that's usually where "poor" people have to go, especially in small towns. Amazon is doing it on a much larger scale.

That's only one country though, whereas amazon is evil world-wide.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Feel free to provide goods to my rural community any time! You can’t believe that poor people have budget consideration and seek the cheapest product?

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Use eBay or literally any other site. What is so specific to amazon that you need ? Amazon isn't even cheaper in many cases if you actually search.

[–] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, they are a master at driving local businesses out of money. Buying a certain pet food at my local retailer (a franchisee) would be about $30. On Amazon, it's $25 (and sometimes even $15-20, if you do the subscription discount). At the local store, I'd have to pay more and drag the stuff home on my own feet.

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

It's the Walmart model. A lot of the frustration is that it's a systemic problem where individuals are incentivized against their best interests and the best interests of their communities.

Because shareholders. The Line, must go up.

Thankfully (/s) Amazon has enough money that it's cheaper to bribe politicians than provide a better product. So systemic solutions are that much more difficult.