this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
492 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

81907 readers
7396 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No human has ever deployed tactical nukes against a nuclear capable enemy.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"no human" but Machines would, since they are unaffected by nuclear winter and radiation.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 6 points 22 hours ago

And they don't have cognition at all. They do not, and can not, think like we do. Maybe some day we will learn to make real AI, these LLM's are not it. It's a cheap trick intelligence,.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Radiation absolutely fucks electronic components

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The electromagnetic pulse caused by a nuke would pop resisters too. AI would more likely use biological means to get rid of us.

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 1 points 19 hours ago

Like heating the planet another degree and starving us out of existence by killing off biodiversity until the crops die out... Like they're doing now?

(I say "Us" when I just really mean the 99% of people that haven't got self sufficient underground complexes)

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Assuming AI would care about itself and not just "solving the problem".

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, these doom scenarios require cascading assumptions and no real answer, except maybe "don't".

[–] hector@lemmy.today 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I think the emp is pretty limited to the blast zone in frying electronics. The fallout from a weapon spreads around the world, circling in the winds countless times dropping dust everywhere, but the emp is localized to more around the area of physical destruction but not sure exactly.

The Neutron bombs, not entirely sure in physics how that works, but they produce no actual blast that causes physical destruction so much and just kills everything.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I repeat, radiation absolutely fucks electronic components. I am not talking about an emp, I am talking about radiation.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, how far from the blast and how does it mess them up do you know? I should know that I guess I just heard about the emp, and not sure how a neutron bomb would affect electronics either.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

No, that I can't answer — it would depend entirely on the level of fallout and where it happens to land.

You would need to be able to perfectly, and I mean perfectly, predict weather months in advance in order to prepare accordingly.

The reaility is that for an AI, or rather an AGI, to make the choice to launch nukes would require them to reach a point where they accept the potential loss of their own 'life' in exchange for whatever value a nuclear war might hold. I struggle to believe that a 'true' AGI would make that choice. There are far too many variables to control in comparison to a biological agent, one that likely would not affect a machine.

Now, a modern AI making that choice? Absolutely possible, the things are fucking crazy with literally no concept of what life is.

[–] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 1 points 16 hours ago

An AI can easily start nuclear war, as can a human.

The only thing preventing a nuclear disaster are all the institutional measures limiting its accessiblity.

If you gave a single human (or a single AI) access to a magic no-strings-attached 'Send a Nuke' button, either the human/AI is the second coming of Jesus Christ, or a nuke will befall some unlucky portion of the population sooner or later. Bonus points if people can talk to the AI or if access to the button is hereditary.

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 1 points 19 hours ago

If you think computers aren't affected by radiation or nuclear winter I've got some bad news about where their power comes from and what the main principle of electricity is

What you're thinking of is Terminator