this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
275 points (97.9% liked)

Not The Onion

20753 readers
1639 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 109 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Trump is about to find out that ship owners won’t risk hundreds of millions per ship on an uninsurable voyage just to stroke his ego.

[–] Fermion@mander.xyz 63 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

It's not even just the price of a ship and cargo at risk. Lead times are around 2.8 to 3 yrs for crude tankers and around 3.5 yrs for LNG carriers. That's a long time to not be able to conduct business even if insurance did pay out. It is 100% rational to sit out a few weeks to figure out how to resume operations safely rather than trying to sneak through and hope for the best.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Well, at least Trump is well known for paying his debts.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 36 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, especially since they have promised its only going to be 3 weeks. It's almost as if that was a lie.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Alternatively wasn't he floating some kind of mandatory insurance scheme? mandatory in the sense that the insurer can't refuse. Sounds like a great time to liquidate some ageing stock for yhuge profits.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

No. Reinsurance "scheme" lets an insurer transfer all risk. If US government is willing to pay the insurer $100M, then they will charge the ship $1M or $99M for the voyage, but keep $100M total. Brian Kilmede will not volunteer to be crew on the ships no matter the pay, either.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago

Should've involuntarily added him to the crew of that genius "submarine". Missed our chance.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 6 points 6 hours ago

Oddly, due to maritime law, it's the cargo owners who would have to pay if the ship was only damaged but not sunk.