this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
471 points (97.6% liked)

Not The Onion

21032 readers
927 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wammityblam@lemmy.world 259 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Fox & Friends co-host Brian Kilmeade who still has a job after saying we should kill the homeless and people with mental health issues (while his other co-hosts were talking about throwing them in prisons or mental institutions)?

That Brian Kilmeade?

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 94 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I swear I heard someone else on the network say the NYC teenagers that threw snowballs at police should get the death penalty.

[–] Wammityblam@lemmy.world 56 points 3 weeks ago

Propaganda machine goes BRRRRRRRRR

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago

This is why we do t like republicans. They think everyone not like them should just die.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Hey he didn't say we should kill them he said we should "involuntarily euthanize" them. That's the problem with politics today people refuse to acknowledge nuance. /s

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Since we're on the topic of nuance: he was fantasizing about "involuntary lethal injection".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wammityblam@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Classic libs not being able to take a joke

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

He’s the only person to be on Fox and friends since the early 00s the others have cycled in and out, I’m not shocked that he’s the worst

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 154 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Trump is about to find out that ship owners won’t risk hundreds of millions per ship on an uninsurable voyage just to stroke his ego.

[–] Fermion@mander.xyz 90 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

It's not even just the price of a ship and cargo at risk. Lead times are around 2.8 to 3 yrs for crude tankers and around 3.5 yrs for LNG carriers. That's a long time to not be able to conduct business even if insurance did pay out. It is 100% rational to sit out a few weeks to figure out how to resume operations safely rather than trying to sneak through and hope for the best.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 54 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, especially since they have promised its only going to be 3 weeks. It's almost as if that was a lie.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Every war ever fought was going to be over in a couple of weeks with an overwhelming victory.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Well, at least Trump is well known for paying his debts.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 11 points 3 weeks ago

Oddly, due to maritime law, it's the cargo owners who would have to pay if the ship was only damaged but not sunk.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Alternatively wasn't he floating some kind of mandatory insurance scheme? mandatory in the sense that the insurer can't refuse. Sounds like a great time to liquidate some ageing stock for yhuge profits.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

No. Reinsurance "scheme" lets an insurer transfer all risk. If US government is willing to pay the insurer $100M, then they will charge the ship $1M or $99M for the voyage, but keep $100M total. Brian Kilmede will not volunteer to be crew on the ships no matter the pay, either.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 weeks ago

Should've involuntarily added him to the crew of that genius "submarine". Missed our chance.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 72 points 3 weeks ago

Lol the peer pressure argument for oil tankers.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 67 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

What an absolute moron! I don't know any other democracy that has such stupid people so regularly on TV.
For fucks sake USA is a shithole country of the worst kind.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 29 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

England has some pretty stupid people on TV regularly.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

That's true, clearly worse than we have here in Denmark. Of course we also have stupid people here, but they are generally not exposed broad and wide on TV.
But UK is still no match for USA from what I have seen. But clearly it's not a problem for a politician to be stupid and also be successful. Theresa May, Boris Johnson, and Liz Truss. Are all examples of that. It's astounding that a known liar like Boris Johnson was allowed to lead UK to vote for Brexit.
30 years ago we had a party leader Svend Auken that was caught in an outright lie. That cost him his political career.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TrollTrollrolllol@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Not only that, some of them were picked right out of their pundit jobs to be in the administration like Kegsbreath

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Goddam that speech about death and destruction raining on Iran from the sky!
Those people are insane.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

"Take massive financial risks to help Trump mitigate the cost he didn't consider at all, of his dumb decision to go to war-not-war with Iran "

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 33 points 3 weeks ago

Lol. Listen to insurance or Brian, what will they choose?

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 3 weeks ago

Hey Brian, why don't you use your own money to buy a tanker and go through the strait yourself? Show some guts Brian!

[–] Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Why would oil tanker crews (which are more than likely made up of non-americans) care about "showing some guts" just so some American gas guzzlers can have cheaper fuel?

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

The idea here is providing Trump public support for attacking Iran. He's in the tank even with his own people, but if a bunch of sailors die he can gain support...I mean probably not but Fox isnt known For its nuance

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

A house slave, a Karen, and a Nazi walk into a bar...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SirMaple__@lemmy.ca 26 points 3 weeks ago

After you, dumbass.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 26 points 3 weeks ago

What a piece of shit.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago

if i could direct this to kilmeade i would, "get on one of those tankers and pilot it through yourself coward"

[–] Babalugats@feddit.uk 18 points 3 weeks ago

They should fly him over on to one of them and meet him show everyone what he means.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 weeks ago

Same message could be given to US naval superpower. "Just go near Iran you chickenshits." instead of staying out of drone range. The tankers in question were supposed to be getting US navy escorts.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

i was going to say insurace companies hate this simple trick but iirc, they tend not to cover for act of war loses

Yeah! Just grow a pair and Mojo Risin that shit. What consequences could there possibly be?

🛳️+🛢️+🔥

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 11 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

US Government should directly insure then use military to back that up.

They created the mess they should own it.

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 20 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm not sure I really want my tax dollars to be insuring oil tankers traveling through a war zone.

I'd rather my tax dollars insure sick people.

Plus, who would be dumb enough to believe that Trump would ever hold up his end of a bargain like that?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Even the us government doesn't have that kind of money

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Nah, we can just parlay on Polymarket

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mvilain@fedia.io 10 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I wonder if Brian wears a condom when he does it.

[–] NorskSud@piefed.social 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think he does it, that might be the main problem actually.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 9 points 3 weeks ago

He must not have their insurance underwriters in his stock portfolio.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Is he… being serious..? Lmfao what the actual fuck do Fox News anchors think they’re doing..?

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 weeks ago

I’m sure a captain sitting in the gulf right now is not watching Fox News. Most are probably not even American.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 weeks ago

Number of captains who took his advice: 0

The power of this guy starts and stops with No-Brain individuals in America.

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 6 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah what are you a bunch of capital lists wanting to be certain you will make a profit?

(Sarcasm)

[–] J92@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

It would not even touch the sides. The master answers to their employer onshore, not some berk on a morning talkshow half way 'round the world. The only thing superseeding their office would be their duty, ie laws of the sea, like if the office told them not to veer off course to answer a distress call.

load more comments
view more: next ›