this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
658 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

82830 readers
3191 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 16 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

There's an anecdote that comes up in software about people working on missile software not caring about memory leaks because it's going to explode anyway before that becomes an issue.

Who cares about bugs in your software if it's a hobby project that's going to blow up anyway.

Also, including Claude doesn't inherently mean vibe coded, it can be for writing tests, small components, or debugging.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip -2 points 4 hours ago

Claude writes better code than most humans and a lot faster

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Using an LLM to write tests and small components is still vibe coding.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Wikipedia says:

Vibe coding involves accepting AI-generated code without reviewing it,

If you are using LLMs to write e.g. small components, then you are typically understanding the structure of the program, and reviewing it.

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

There's nothing inherent to small components to suggest that you have to review them. If they're small, it's easier to tell yourself that the LLM probably got them right and you're justified in not checking.

[–] toad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago

Listen to me. I do code for a living. Nobody want to write HTML