this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
301 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

82745 readers
3191 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 21 points 2 hours ago

What a time to be alive... For now

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

This wont scare the think of the children crowd at all.

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 1 points 56 minutes ago* (last edited 55 minutes ago)

!noncredibledefense@piefed.social

[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago

Can't wait for the next Luigi to use one of these on an Epstein CEO. Polymarket, please let me make that bet.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 63 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (13 children)

Notably absent... the explosives.

But sure, if you are wondering how folks out in Yemen or Gaza managed to retaliate against their oppressors for so long, this is a textbook example of how and why. What's being proposed is collection of technology we've had since at least the 1960s that's slowly made its way into civilian circulation.

Also...

Khojayev's just-launched prototype has no effectiveness track record

I mean, we're seeing what "just-launched prototypes with no effective track record" have accomplished on the Ukraine-Russia front-lines and it's a decidedly mixed bag.

I think a harder question to answer is "Who would be interested in putting one of these into practical use?" And that gets to the real value-add of a Stinger MANPAD. Namely, the humans willing and practiced enough to use it.

Also - and again, this cannot be overstated - the model above has no explosives installed. Idk how confident I'd be around one of these things if it was actually armed.

I’d build and use one of these if I could get the explosives to go with it and the address of a CEO.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

You can deploy a lot of $96 semi-effective hardware and improve it vs something that might be thousands or even tens or hundreds of thousands to deploy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] riskable@programming.dev 6 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

You don't need explosives. It has a spot in the front for a camera. One of the new microcontrollers with AI accelerators can do face recognition extremely quickly. It would be possible to use it as an assassination tool.

Even if you changed nothing about the design, the speed and mass of the thing hitting a person in the face could kill.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

As the bps space YouTube channel has shown, reliability is paramount in any launch, especially a guided launch.

That and people duck when shit flies at them, unless it's supersonic, which again, as bps space has shown, control of a supersonic flight is extremely difficult to get right.

This is a guy who landed a hobby rocket like a tesla booster.

But at $100 a pop, you could have backups. (or payloads)

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 1 hour ago

Why kill only one when you can do a whole blast and get a multi-kill?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

It's not a MANPAD really.

The sensor package has no IR sensor (or radar unit) and no way to proximity fuse.

It has GPS, accelerometer and barometric pressure. It's more like a rocket powered artillery shell than an anti-air weapon.

Or, given the lack of payload, it's more like a high speed burrito delivery device.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 14 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

it’s more like a high speed burrito delivery device.

See, now you've got my interest.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 17 points 3 hours ago

future Taco Bell vs future Del Taco during dinner rush:

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 13 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Plastic explosive triggered by electrodetonator is quite safe.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] slackj_87@lemmy.world 113 points 6 hours ago (23 children)

Great... can't wait for politicians to use this as a way to pass "common sense" legislation banning 3D printers.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

They already are over 3d guns, this will send them ballistic. They want every printer to keep a record of everything they've printed. Model legislation, I think CA tried and so far failed to pass it.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 5 hours ago

And just like age verification it's useless because one can build a 3d printer out of an old VCR and a hot glue gun.

[–] Janx@piefed.social 37 points 6 hours ago (5 children)

Aren't they already doing that due to their hysteria over "ghost" guns?

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Trying to yes. I think it's model legislation, probably ALEC bs, if I recall CA tried to pass it and hasn't yet. Maybe a year back.

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 hour ago

Washington State's bill would ban offline 3d printing and essentially force all printers to include DRM to stop undesirable printing.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 hour ago

The kind that can be better made with $20 and a trip to home depot?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 44 points 6 hours ago (7 children)

It's uhh, for home defense

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 37 minutes ago (1 children)

Against invading homes? Do you get those a lot in your area?

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

Not anymore

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›