this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
436 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

82989 readers
3177 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 60 points 2 days ago (37 children)

Boo for the cyber attack but fuck people who drive drunk repeatedly to the point of needing an interlock device. Maybe don't drink and drive you fucking sack of shit.

[–] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not-so hot take: the underlying issue is lack of public transportation.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 16 hours ago

100% for most places. However I'll say Ive known alot of folks who will go up into the bush and get blasted only to drive home. I doubt transit would stop that shit.

[–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Never knew anyone who had one, but a friend of mine dated a guy who did. He would beg her to breathe into it for him.

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's insane but as an alcoholic I can absolutely see someone doing it.

Some are social butterflies who have to be out and about but talk about not learning lessons.

[–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“Not learning lessons” is a pretty mild way to put it.

The only way it isn’t pure evil is if we allow that the alcoholic is not in control of their actions. And if we allow that, they cannot be trusted to drive, or really to even have their freedom. They are 5150, plain and simple.

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

They're in control but reaching them is something best done by people like them in my experience.

Logic only goes so far, clearly.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Fuck the lock, ban them from driving. Inexcusable.

[–] ChillCapybara@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Comments sections. Where nuance goes to die. All context is flattened and your views must be expressed as black or white lest you get branded as having the wrong opinion.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 1 points 21 hours ago

Better nuance dies than innocent bystanders as the drunk driver plows into people.

Amen, Lemmy is in the starting stages of how reddit went my brother. It's inherent to the format

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don't think alcoholics should be allowed to drive, is that too much to ask?

Driving is a privilege, not a right, and the roads are already dangerous enough as they are.

I understand the dynamics in the US are what they are regarding cars and the lack of public transportation or bicycle infrastructure, but I don't believe the avoidable deaths are a worthy trade off. Change needs to start somewhere, and excusing the deaths for some artificially created issue is not acceptable.

[–] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So... Just tell them that it's illegal for them to drive? Kind of like how we tell them that it's illegal to drink and drive but they did that anyway? The point of the lock is that it's for people who are going to ignore the law anyway. Not having a license does not stop somebody from operating a motor vehicle.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

You make a good point. I still don't have an ounce of patience for alcoholics who drive, but I do agree that it creates a mental trap of "you have a perfectly good car right here if you just stop drinking for 24 hours"

[–] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Driving under the influence is a ban able offence (reckless endangerment) in most countries.

So is a proper driver's ed before giving even a learner's permit. US loves giving a multi ton killing machine to untrained people with impulse control. And teenagers

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I agree with you, but the difference is that, in the US, people NEED to be able to drive to function in society. That's why the bar has to be so low to get a license.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm sure the lives lost were worth it so that alcoholics and irresponsible people can keep functioning in society. /s

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It isn't. Public transit is great. When will it be discovered in America? Who knows.

[–] iSeth@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Perfect solution. Really needs public transit or walkable cities to work so win-win.

[–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Of course better transit is a better solution, but at least while America is waiting for that, ride-hailing services can help fill a gap. Expensive? I have little sympathy for people who drove drunk on that count.

[–] darkkite@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

you only need to get caught once for the lock

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (5 children)

It's a shame that it's only when they get caught. There's no excuse for driving drunk.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)