Linux

64743 readers

474 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

272

The Ageless Device: Cheap gadgets for violating the California Digital Age Assurance Act (agelesslinux.org)

submitted 1 month ago by davel@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

83 comments fedilink hide all child comments

They’re basically minimum-viable products that by design can be used to violate the law in California when the Act goes into effect on Jan. 1, 2027.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

AB 1043 passed the California Assembly 76–0 and the Senate 38–0. Not a single legislator voted against it.

1798.503. (a) A person that violates this title shall be subject to an injunction and liable for a civil penalty of not more than two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) per affected child for each negligent violation or not more than seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500) per affected child for each intentional violation

This device does not collect, store, or transmit the age of its user. This is intentional.

Is there any reason to believe they won't want to make an example out of intentional violators?

[–] tristynalxander@mander.xyz 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

They probably will, but I think the intentional violators are intending to make a spectacle out of it. I suspect California Voters will have it repealed in short order, but in the mean time the world should probably ruthlessly mock and isolate them.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

I have serious doubts about any voters, anywhere in the world, repealing any laws like this:

Most people like laws that let them avoid responsibility
Most people are, or have been, parents at some point
Most parents will offload the responsibility onto "the government" instead of admitting to poor parenting

This kind of act of insubordination, the way it is framed, I'm afraid is likely to meet the opposition of most people.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't know, maybe not looking stupid

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 3 points 1 month ago

In whose eyes? They have lobbyists backing them, and a general public who doesn't know any better, or care to know.

Exposing the stupidity is a great goal, running headfirst into the "Who will think of the children!1!!" wall... not so much.