this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
223 points (98.7% liked)

Linux

64004 readers
679 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They’re basically minimum-viable products that by design can be used to violate the law in California when the Act goes into effect on Jan. 1, 2027.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world 1 points 19 minutes ago

What in leftist infighting hell is even happening in this comment section?

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 118 points 1 day ago (2 children)

By the way, the current age verification madness is a coordinated lobbying campaign by Meta

[–] EonNShadow@pawb.social 21 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

One more reason for me to fucking hate Zuckerberg.

Add it to the pile at this point...

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 1 points 10 minutes ago

Zuckerberg and Thiel.

[–] org@lemmy.org 18 points 1 day ago (13 children)

To avoid any responsibility for them not moderating.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] brokenwing@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 day ago (14 children)

Wait are they planing to fine non-age verification compliant devices?

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

AB 1043 passed the California Assembly 76–0 and the Senate 38–0. Not a single legislator voted against it.

1798.503. (a) A person that violates this title shall be subject to an injunction and liable for a civil penalty of not more than two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) per affected child for each negligent violation or not more than seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500) per affected child for each intentional violation

This device does not collect, store, or transmit the age of its user. This is intentional.

Is there any reason to believe they won't want to make an example out of intentional violators?

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know, maybe not looking stupid

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 2 points 17 hours ago

In whose eyes? They have lobbyists backing them, and a general public who doesn't know any better, or care to know.

Exposing the stupidity is a great goal, running headfirst into the "Who will think of the children!1!!" wall... not so much.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 35 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Can someone eli5 the idea? I don't get it, even after reading the page. But now I want one.

[–] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's protestware, which is great.

I agree, but now I am torn because I'm protesting the US as a whole right now.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're breaking evil age verification laws on purpose as civil disobedience with cheap hardware

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

OK, the disobedience was the part I didn't get. Thank you!

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Insofar as part availability isn't insurmountably impacted this also constitutes functional resistance to all manor of censorship and surveillance. If you can code, test on one of these

I can, but I probably won't, because my backlog is full and overflowing. But it is cheap... damn.

[–] jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (10 children)

California is adding a requirement for age verification for operating systems (or something like that) so each one of these violates that law by booting into linux.

[–] dan@upvote.au 14 points 1 day ago

Not just California. Several other US states are considering (or will be rolling out) similar laws, and Brazil's version has already rolled out this month.

This was the part I got. But I wondered how that would help?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] msspwn@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Amazing. Where are the build instructions

[–] parson0@startrek.website 3 points 1 day ago

Coming in Q3

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Brilliant. I'd like to see how the very uninformed legislators deal with this. They will have to publically re-argue first principles

[–] groet@feddit.org 1 points 3 hours ago

Why though? How does this force anybody to do anything? They will fine anybody 2500$ for handing this to a kid and call it a day. Maybe even move closer to the maximum fine because it is a deliberate breaking of the law.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

Brilliant! 💪

load more comments
view more: next ›