this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
974 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

83251 readers
3066 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 57 points 5 days ago (7 children)

I was a space kid, followed every space shot since 1965, was a super fan of Apollo 11, I had a subscription to Nat Geo growing up, just for the Space photos.

So I can't believe I'm saying this: Maybe we've gone far enough for now, and we should have a moratorium on space for the next 50 years.

We should concentrate on Earth for awhile, dontcha think?

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I dunno, every engineer not working on space almost certainly ends up optimizing some sort of ad delivery system. The tech industry is almost completely enshittified.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I was thinking more like Climate Change and Infrastructure and suchlike.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

That’s great, but that comes from funding those things, not shutting down a different industry. It’d be better to shut down non-productive industries like bombing brown kids in the Middle East.

[–] Trilogy3452@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (3 children)

This isn't really space science related, just commercialization. And about focusing on Earth: we should let scientists work on what they're passionate about, IMO they'll be more motivated to research their field of choice

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

we should let scientists work on what they're passionate about

*fund them

Why is it always 100x more on useless destruction and military? And yeah i know the sad answer already.

[–] Trilogy3452@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

By work I meant study, not necessarily being employed by a company if that's what you meant

[–] Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

True, that is how we got unit 731.

[–] cole@lemdro.id -3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

SpaceX has developed laundry list of new technology to enable Starlink and other endeavors. It's silly to discount that as worthless.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

If your scientific discovery disproportionately benefits a few billionaires then it's worse than worthless.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

AND makes life far worse for literally the entire planet.

Imagine unilaterally deciding that increasing your already obscene fortune is more important than every living creature that will ever exist in the future having a sky to enjoy, ever again. To these people, human joy is not something worth preserving.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 2 points 5 days ago

Dude is so cartoonishly evil that it hurts

[–] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

To these people, human joy is an indulgence for the weak.

You know how over-exaggerated cartoonish villains will talk about how love and caring make you weak? Basically that.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 4 days ago

That's because he's an ogre who has to pay women to be artificially inseminated because, they won't go anywhere near him, and his weener won't work anyhow, due to botched enlargement surgery.

Just repellant.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

lol just so you know a "laundry list" is a list of bad things.

And no, rockets that can put stuff into orbit where around even before Mama Musk shat out lil Mech-Hitler.

[–] cole@lemdro.id 1 points 5 days ago

Not like these ones. I'm almost tired of having this discussion y'all are blinded by hatred.

First full flow staged combustion engine, dramatically lower launch prices than competitors (cheaper for the government and has enabled more interesting things to go to space), dramatically more access (SpaceX flies multiple times a week!), booster recovery & rocket reuse.

And again I know everyone really is blinded by their seething rage but starship is going to change the whole landscape again.

You can hate the man as much as you want, I'm not saying I don't. But you discredit yourself by not knowing what SpaceX is actually doing.

I mean, we still wouldn't have US access to space without SpaceX (Boeing fiasco...).

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Not gonna happen. Not with the effective altruist cult running things.

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't think you are using altruist right, or I am missing some sarcasm here.

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

A lot of the ultra wealthy espouse a nonsense philosophy called "Effective Altruism", which asserts a kind of utilitarian "most good for the most people" ethic, but in such a way that one can basically justify any action as being, eventually, for the most good ¯_(ツ)_/¯

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Including being good to hypothetical, unlikely trillions that may live someday if we colonize Mars.

[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

I've been really passionate about space. My bday is on the anniversary of the moon landing, and my one aunt has always reminded me of the fact. My great grandfather worked for NASA and my aunt gave me his stargazing binoculars that his brother gave him when he got hired at NASA. That part of my family instilled a huge love of science in me, esp space stuff. I wanna go to space more than anything, but I don't have the brains or constitution to be an astronaut. So I just daydream, stargaze, and write poems about the cosmos.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago

Right. Elon hires people on the basis they'll be making Mars travel possible, but that Starship is really for dumping metal all over the night sky.

maybe just for this one guy you know

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Believe it or not, you can do two things at once. Some people are interested in space, some in geology. That's fine.

i just tried to chew gum and walk and my personal injury attorney would like to know your address (they think you're cute)

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Kinda missing the point there.

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago