this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
312 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

83126 readers
3137 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (4 children)

Why not just make it so nobody under 18 can own a smartphone. Why these fucking useless age checks.

[–] darkkite@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Me using an android as a child taught me how to use linux, command line etc. seems arbitrary to deny the phone entirely. maybe certain online services should be though

[–] Virtvirt588@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

as a child

So you where under 12, when you learned how to use Linux? Its either that or you where actually a teenager not a child.

But in general I do agree with controls set on children, locally by the parents that is - excluding teenagers.

[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Virtvirt588@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Exactly, children and teenagers are meere tools.

[–] Virtvirt588@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Rhetorical questions aside. Let's not counteract a dystopia with another dystopa here.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This. Smart watches exist. Kids don't need smartphones.

[–] Ravel@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If you grow up one of the tiny % of kids that grow up without one, it will result in some developmental disadvantages I think. On the other hand, modern social media will impose another set of disadvantages, but fact is that social media and the internet in general are a large part of modern society, so not being able to interface with it until you're 18 will leave you behind a learning curve.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Actual studies say that kids that use phones and laptops are actually less intelligent. I think no phones until 18 would be doable. No laptops would be hard though.

[–] Ravel@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

Someone who didn't touch a phone until 18 is going to be so susceptible to scams, catfishes, propaganda, digital manipulation, etc, that I definitely think it is a dangerous nuclear option. Controlled, monitored by good parents, layered introduction is definitely better in my opinion.