this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
296 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

83126 readers
3137 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 hours ago

GrapheneOS baby

Kicked my 15pro

[–] kepix@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

bullshit. no they won't. stock android also gonna get age verification, and is considered bad by apple users, plus its a different ecosystem. stop sharing shit articles like this.

[–] aeiou_ckr@lemmy.world 3 points 57 minutes ago (1 children)

I might be a minority but the week liquid glass hit my phone I ordered a pixel, sold my iphone. iPad, apple watch, and air tags that weekend.

I don't know if that compares as one is a ui/function overhaul and the other is a data field for access to things.

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 3 points 25 minutes ago (1 children)

No idea what liquid glass is, but that's a heavy reaction.

What are you sporting now?

[–] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 minutes ago

It’s a tweak to the UI. Not perfect, but I barely even notice a difference from old UI. People just like to complain.

The clear icons are ugly, but you don’t have to use them, so it doesn’t really matter.

[–] Ransack3@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago

I always assumed that they were collecting that data from your contacts list already. I'd like to know how many people are actually affected by this or needed to "verify" their age after updating to 26.4

Also, switching to Android isn't going to help with this.

[–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 22 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

Folks, this is coming from your government. The phone makers want nothing to do with it and are actively fighting it in court as best they can. Switching between phone makers will not help, and is not the right place to put your energy. Address your concerns to your governments.

[–] bluetoofs@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 33 minutes ago)

Taking it up with our governments is fruitless as well. The days of governments actually giving a shit about what we want are over. If you’re not flush with cash, your voice can and will be overridden at the drop of a hat.

[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 hours ago (11 children)

The phone makers want your data just as much as the government does. Data is money and power.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (4 children)

Why not just make it so nobody under 18 can own a smartphone. Why these fucking useless age checks.

[–] Virtvirt588@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Rhetorical questions aside. Let's not counteract a dystopia with another dystopa here.

[–] darkkite@lemmy.ml 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Me using an android as a child taught me how to use linux, command line etc. seems arbitrary to deny the phone entirely. maybe certain online services should be though

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

This. Smart watches exist. Kids don't need smartphones.

[–] Ravel@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

If you grow up one of the tiny % of kids that grow up without one, it will result in some developmental disadvantages I think. On the other hand, modern social media will impose another set of disadvantages, but fact is that social media and the internet in general are a large part of modern society, so not being able to interface with it until you're 18 will leave you behind a learning curve.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 0 points 36 minutes ago (1 children)

Actual studies say that kids that use phones and laptops are actually less intelligent. I think no phones until 18 would be doable. No laptops would be hard though.

[–] Ravel@sh.itjust.works 2 points 33 minutes ago

Someone who didn't touch a phone until 18 is going to be so susceptible to scams, catfishes, propaganda, digital manipulation, etc, that I definitely think it is a dangerous nuclear option. Controlled, monitored by good parents, layered introduction is definitely better in my opinion.

[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Virtvirt588@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Exactly, children and teenagers are meere tools.

[–] Adam_Crock@lemmy.world 33 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I am more happy than ever with my GrapheneOS phone. Especially after they refused to include age verfication I recommend everyone to switch to grapheneos or any other custom ROM android

[–] uhmbah@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

Same. GrapheneOS, no playstore

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 16 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

But they already switched to Android when Apple removed the headphone jack. Oh wait, that's right - nobody did.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›