this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
279 points (98.6% liked)
Technology
83600 readers
4162 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That’s my biggest issue with notifications. Notifications should just notify you that something happened and you need to open the app to find out. Carrying actual data ON the notification is a no-no.
But what do I know, I’m an old developer not one of these modern vibe kiddies.
Signal already has that setting. It’s up to the user to decide their level of convenience vs security.
Yeah. It's not just signal either that could be an issue. Sure, I want my private messages to be private, but there are financial apps, business email, and many other bits of very sensitive information that could be captured in those messages
The actual notification telling you there is a message shouldn't contain the content if its sensitive, it should only carry an ID to said message, and im certain this is what signal does. Thats like the most utter basic thing about notifications.
Once that notification arrives, the system decides what to show you after fetching the message from the ID in the background. You can opt to keep that private or show it.
In this case if you opt to show it, it leaks.
A notification doesn’t have to carry any data in its payload; Signal devs could take care of that.
Signal has supported this for many years. Users can choose full content notifications, name only, or no-content notifications.
I believe what’s in the payload is not the same as what the user chooses to see. That is, it’s sent no matter what but the user can set what’s visible on the lock screen. I could be wrong though.
That's a separate OS setting. Signal itself has its own setting for which content is actually sent in the notification.
Why do you so confidently assert things which you do not know but merely believe without checking?
Did I not qualify it by saying I could be wrong? What is so confident about that? Jesus Christ, nobody asked you.
“Signal devs could take care of that”
They did like eight years ago.
You even double qualified it, prefacing with "I believe"
What an ass
That's not the problem here. Showing a notification with content is not a big deal.
In the case stated here, the big deal is that the notification HISTORY was preserved after removal of Signal. That's because both Apple and Google do the same thing. They keep a notification history. Not on a per-app basis, ALL apps notification history is stored.
I know that on Androids, it is turned off by default and you can turn it on, so you get the impression that Android doesn't have this issue. I am going to guess as I do not own an apple anything that iOS has notification history turned on by default. This is the real problem. This is not anything Signal can control for unless they were to not support notifications which would render their app useless, so that's not an option.