this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
859 points (98.1% liked)
Technology
84354 readers
3929 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is fucked. But aren't "passenger vehicles" actually quite rare? I think most (environmental and safety) regulation is on passenger vehicles, which is why auto manufacturers try and sell so many trucks and SUVs since they don't count as "passenger vehicles". I could be wrong and this mandate is going to target all consumer vehicles.
Fuck all cars and our American car brained culture. But also fuck this legislation.
You are wrong. The move to SUVs and trucks is because the the larger a vehicle is, the more lenient the regulations are. That's why the current Ranger is larger than a 90s F150.
It's that, plus other factors. The regulations are more lenient, it's easier to get a more efficient engine in with more mass to work with, it's easier to pass safety ranking checks, and it's easier to put comfort features in that consumers want.
Putting a large crumple zone on a compact isn't as easy as putting one on a giant truck.
(Note this isn't saying big cars are more or proportionally more efficient , but that the efficiency advances they've made over the years are easier to implement in a large engine)