this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
374 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

84069 readers
4773 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I can't. I just can't.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

Every technology is eventually used against you by the state

[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago

If this comes to Canada I'll be driving an electric scooter or bike.

[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

I assume the NHTSA will pay for it? Good luck, fuckers.

[–] Eryn6844@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

guess its time to buy the 1995 ford then?

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 2 points 25 minutes ago (1 children)

I'd recommend a 1995 Toyota, Nissan or Mitsubishi rather than a Ford 😅

[–] this_1_is_mine@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 minutes ago

I don't see any 95 Toyota's Honda's Mitsubishi or Nissan but I do see a lot of 95 Fords. I'll go with what I can find

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 19 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Cars have been privacy nightmares for quite a while. People simply do not care.

[–] Tywele@piefed.social 14 points 5 hours ago

Many don’t even know to start caring.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I care. But they make it really hard to remove or disable that shit.

[–] FUsername@feddit.org 1 points 18 minutes ago* (last edited 18 minutes ago)

I think, you better can buy cars without will that fancy shit and add features by aftermarket devices than doing it any using all that closed eco system crap from the manufacturer.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 9 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

My car is constantly telling me to drive with both hands or yo get coffee when I am driving fine.

Many years ago I had a somewhat scary car accident and since I drive very cautiously and never speed. Yet this fucking thing is still yelling at me all the time.

If I could figure out how it decides to yell at me, I would unplug it.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 4 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

What car is that? So that I know never to buy or suggest one

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 minutes ago

Ford Fusion

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Every new car has a million alerts and beeps and warnings and its sensory hell

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah the beeps and bongs are not a new thing. Clarkson raged about it 20+ years ago. "I KNOW THE DOOR IS OPEN THERES A HUGE GAP NEXT TO ME"

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

No, that's not even close to how bad it is now. Hell, I bought a car that's a decade old and the fucker yells at me for being to close to the lines, yells if I'm approaching a stopped car "too fast" (which means it freaks out even when I'm slowing past 25 with 4-5 SUV lengths ahead of me), when I back up and there's anything remotely close off to the side (remotely close is the 2.5 ft on either side of me as I back out my driveway), and it gives me an extra special freak out if there's any possible cross traffic to 4 houses on either side of me. That last one is a nice warning the few times I've needed it, but more often than not, it's spazzing out over the neighbors taking their dog out on the other side of the street.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 1 points 33 minutes ago

Yeah I didn't mean to say that its been that bad forever. Its gotten worse in the last 10-15 years. But it started ages ago, back in the ancient times. I remember my 1987 Volkswagen had a buzzer if I had lights on when the ignition was off. That was a good thing to have tbh, especially back then. But now you get a warning bong just because you have a kilogram of apples on the back seat.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 2 points 38 minutes ago

I have a 2023 and while it does those things by default every single one of them can be turned off.

The front collision and the movement behind were left on because they occasionally help. Lane assist and the proximity got turned off immediately because of so many false alarms.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 1 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Many cars that can tell that, senses wether or not you give any resistance whenever it corrects the lane position. If it doesn't feel any resistance, it'll assume you're not actually holding the steering wheel. Try keeping a firmer grip of the wheel.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I have to admit to developing the habit of wiggling the steering wheel regularly. Unfortunately that doesn’t help for camera based systems

[–] BlindFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Instructions unclear, steering wheel now layered in zip ties

[–] brokenwing@discuss.tchncs.de 57 points 10 hours ago (5 children)

Why are govts like this suddenly? All in a arms race against privacy?

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Because late stage capitalism, lobbyists pushed legislators to allow data collection so that it can be sold to insurance companies who also lobbied so that they can charge more for premiums.

Every company makes more profit.

We don't live in a democracy anymore.

Guillotine insurance companies. They're just scummy middle-men that seek profit at the cost of everyone else

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 hours ago

They're scared of the likes of Luigi and paper Mario. More and more people are getting fed up

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Not suddenly. It's been going on at least as far back as 2001. Probably more. It's generally not the gov't either as the gov't is mostly driven by moneyed private interests like large corporations. They always push in different ways to get more power to make profit. Get rid of a regulation, make new regulation, get a subsidy, limit rights to resist some abuse, etc. Sometimes it's just more obvious that others in general, or it's in an are we personally pay attention to, and we're like WTAF.

[–] LuminousLuddite@lemmy.world 27 points 9 hours ago

This was mandated by the 2021 infrastructure bill. I was hoping it got scrapped but apparently not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 22 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

What the fuck? When did Congress pass this, and why wasn't there a huge public outcry against it?

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

This shit is why biden didnt arrest trump. Democrats need him to drive voters their way. To use the dump as a club to hit any one who has a independent thought.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 9 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

https://futurism.com/the-byte/camera-cars-detects-drinking

A team of Australian scientists have cooked up a new AI-driven camera system that can detect whether you are too drunk to drive a vehicle.

But the project isn’t quite ready for wide use with only 75 percent accuracy, according to the researchers out of Edith Cowan University in Western Australia, who had presented this camera project at a computer vision conference earlier this year.

Should be interesting.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I assume the system is working properly and 25% of drivers just drive as erratically sober as the other 75% blind drunk.

And that's among the ones who managed to get to the study. The percentage would be higher if it took into account the ones who got lost or crashed on the way.

[–] GarboDog@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

If that was true should be rolled out as that’s about the same thing. Those people shouldn’t drive / should go/back to driving school

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago

with only 75 percent accuracy

Unless they're telling you the Type 1 and Type 2 error rates, they're not worth a shit.

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 11 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

So how much is this tech going to raise already stupidly high car prices.

[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

$100-$500 according to the article. No discount for the biometric data they'll sell.

[–] ragas@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 hours ago

Because they were already selling it before.

[–] doc@sopuli.xyz 117 points 13 hours ago (9 children)

And when all the used cars are gone and I'm forced to buy one of these I'll promptly be destroying the radio transmitters and everything related to this surveillance.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›