this post was submitted on 07 May 2026
361 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

84433 readers
3823 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Google is making it mandatory to have Play Services for its next-generation reCAPTCHA system on Android.

  • Your phone will need to be running Play Services version 25.41.30 or greater when the system asks you to scan a QR code for verification.

  • This hurdle means that de-Googled phones will fail the verification test by default.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 13 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

At that point, reCAPTCHA will forgo the old image puzzles and require you to scan a QR code with your smartphone to prove you’re human.

What is that supposed to mean? What QR code? Just any? I'm supposed to find some QR code laying around and scan it? Or will the webpage display a QR and I'm supposed to scan it with my phone using a mirror or something?

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The example image I saw was of a page opened on a laptop, which prompted you to scan with a phone. If you don't have a (compatible) phone, I'm curious how that would go.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, I thought they are talking about browsing on their phones.

That still makes very little sense. What if someone has an iPhone? What if I am browsing on my phone? What if I don't have my phone near me? This sounds like some optional, extreme case feature. Like when they are pretty much sure you're a bot but the website optionally gives you last one chance to prove you're not instead of just rejecting your request.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

What if someone has an iPhone?

Per https://support.google.com/recaptcha/answer/16609652

Supported Environments for reCAPTCHA Mobile Verification:

  • Android Devices:

    • Google Play Services version 25.41.30 or greater.
    • To verify Google Play Services version on an Android device, open Settings > Apps > All Apps > Google Play Services
  • iOS/iPadOS devices for QR Code Scan:

    • Version 15.0 or greater.
  • iOS/iPadOS devices for "Click to Verify" Button:

    • Version 16.4 or greater.
    • Version 15.0-16.4 with the reCAPTCHA app installed.

What if I am browsing on my phone?

I'm not seeing anything related to that specifically, but I imagine a (supported) mobile browser will be able to interface with Play Services directly and not need a QR code challenge.

If you use an unsupported browser, I think we can both guess what's gonna happen. As for what browsers are supported:

https://support.google.com/recaptcha/answer/6223828?hl=en&ref_topic=6188330&sjid=5375685544242031989-EU

Browser requirements for reCAPTCHA

We support the two most recent major versions of the following:

  • desktop (Windows, Linux, Mac) - Chrome - Firefox - Safari - Chromium Edge
  • mobile
    • Chrome
    • Safari
    • Android native browser

Guess if you're using Firefox mobile, you're fucked - plz switch to Chrome, thank you and welcome to our digital ~~prison~~ saferoom!

What if I don't have my phone near me?

You mean you don't carry our surveillance device with you 23/7 (we'll give you an hour for sleep)?

I'm somehow reminded of that mobile Diablo announcement and the surprised response "Don't you guys have phones?"

This sounds like some optional, extreme case feature. Like when they are pretty much sure you're a bot but the website optionally gives you last one chance to prove you're not instead of just rejecting your request.

The stated goal is to fight fraudulent agentic AI: "As we identify potentially fraudulent behavior from agents, we enable application providers to deter and mitigate malicious requests by requesting humans to be in the loop using the new QR code-based challenge."

https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/introducing-google-cloud-fraud-defense-the-next-evolution-of-recaptcha/

So they'd do this when they suspect the thing interacting with the page is not a human, but expects a human to be involved with the process. How exactly that "potentially fraudulent behavior" would be detected is a different question and I have absolutely zero faith that it will fulfill its mission dutifully and without collateral damage. But then, if you're compliant with their requirements, that collateral damage is negligible. They made sure that the ~~prison~~ saferoom is really comfy.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks for checking. That clarifies things a lot.

I guess we're fucked. reCaptcha is not used for visiting websites but for registering or submitting form. I can think of couple of cases where I'm required to complete captcha for online shopping or, ever worse, for work. Step by step they will force us all to either use approved devices or be locked out of big parts of the internet.

This is of course thanks to all the people shitting on Firefox over the years and saying that Chrome is just better and that there's nothing wrong with giving Google control over the web. So yeah, thanks.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 3 points 3 hours ago

I had unsolvable captcha for Github once. Fuck ne, I guess. I just wanted to contribute something, but whatever.

Step by step they will force us all to either use approved devices or be locked out of big parts of the internet.

there's nothing wrong with giving Google control over the web

To quote a song about a "Fairytale of Doom":

Blinded by gold and blinded by diamonds
I let you chain me in silk
You told me lies, I drowned in your eyes
And in all those castles you built

Silver the treasure and gold in the cages
Nothing was quite as it seemed
And when I realized, you turned the key and
I saw your eyes full of greed
It was too late when I screamed

I try to stay optimistic that this won't be tenable. Giving in to despair makes it harder to muster the will to resist. But I won't deny it's getting tougher.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 3 hours ago

They'll mail you one. Can't use the Internet without a physical interface. Don't worry though, you won't need a CD ROM for this one.