this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
949 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

84668 readers
7063 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 145 points 1 day ago (26 children)

I want to say "no shit" but then I remembered that most people have no idea how safe nuclear reactors actually are

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 77 points 1 day ago (26 children)

There's a huge anti-nuclear crowd, I'd prefer we focus on renewables as much as possible but it's stupid not to phase out oil/gas for nuclear as a more consistent source.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (10 children)

There's a huge anti-nuclear crowd

Which was grass-rooted by oil companies back in the 70s.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

astroturfed. Because it's fake grass-roots.

[–] Jaycifer@piefed.social 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Wait, is that what astroturfing refers to?! That makes so much sense now.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 hours ago

Yeah, I learned it after years of seeing it on reddit, because someone finally explained it lol

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Yes! That's the term I was trying to think of.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Given the massive amount of land we have renewables are the clear winner. Densely populated countries, with little to no coastline, would get better use out of nuclear.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago

Yes that's why I said both, renewables require a lot of space both for generation and storage and generally has peaks and valleys on generation, vs nuclear which can consistently provide a stable amount generally.

[–] YourAvgMortal@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Even if/when we replace fossil fuels with renewables, we still need a solution for surges, and nuclear would fit that very well

I thought nuclear was slow to ramp up and down and basically has to operate 24/7, providing a baseload. Batteries otoh are the quickest source to respond to surges from my understanding. Renewables+batteries are have been cheap enough for years that they're also good for baseload.

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I live in a dry but mountainous area. I'd like to see them pump water uphill with any overpower so we can just use turbines to recapture that energy later. The average american keeps impressing me with their turnip-level intellect to the point where I don't want them running a carwash, much less a nuclear reactor. There are a lot of IRL Homer Simpsons out there.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] starblursd@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well when annoying orange decided to cut the safety regulations on nuclear they became a bit more sketchy but yeah still would rather have that than a data center... One benefits all and the other benefits shareholders feelings till the bubble pops

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)