this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
658 points (99.3% liked)

Games

48514 readers
972 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Authorities brought 20 police cars, five SWAT officers, and drones to her house

https://www.twitch.tv/grammacrackers/clip/CharmingSolidNoodleKevinTurtle-CCpMMy7EX_W4v7_S

update: Found this video from local news https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGeb3cuqLxE

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 123 points 13 hours ago (4 children)
[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Everyone blames swatting on the person who called in a fake report, but swatting only works because the are idiots. Someone actually decided to bring 20 cars to an house legally owned by an 85 year old with a single unverified repot as their only evidence.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

In fairness, the police don't have a list of who is in every house at all times. They don't exactly have X-ray vision. All they know is that they got a call saying that someone is holding someone at gunpoint in this house.

Of course, 20 cars is comically overkill

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

This sort of overreaction isn't rare though. People have died from it.

It's also not exclusive to the U.S. We had a guy here in Sweden who got assaulted and practically kidnapped by masked men in the middle of the night. Guy thought he was going to die, and didn't find out that they were police until they got him in the car and drove to the station.

What was his horrible crime? He'd shared images via Yahoo mail of him and his 30 year old boyfriend having sex. Some American organisation trawled through Yahoo mail, flagged these images and videos as possible CSAM, and forwarded it to Swedish authorities. Our authorities, instead of you know, doing any kind of investigation, or summoning the guy to the police station, or even just arresting him in a calm and peaceful manner, decided that sending masked goons to raid his home in the middle of the night was the way to go.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Oh yeah, I'm fully aware. My own city made national headlines in my country a few years back when bastard pig Justin Rapp shot and killed Andrew Finch. SWATting should be considered attempted murder, and if a pig murders someone during a SWATting, they should be charged as well.

Fun fact! Bastard pig Justin Rapp sued the city when they placed him on leave, and won. Now he's a detective whose salary is paid by my tax dollars. Fuck the police

[–] Soulifix@piefed.world 71 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

Never ceases to amuse me how they send a ridiculous amount of deputies to one situation. They couldn't agree on a team or maybe two qualified people, no, let's send the whole fucking department and have extras just incase.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 74 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Meanwhile, when an actual credible threat is ongoing: "We'll send our best confrontation avoider and check back in about 3 hours from now"

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 71 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I will never forgive Uvalde police for that school shooting situation. Not only did they do nothing to stop the shooter, they actively held back parents who were going to do the cops jobs for them.

If I remember right, 23 kids, and 3 staff members died that day in an attack that took hours, but should have been stopped in minutes. They arrived on the scene 6 minutes after being called. Then they let it go on and on and on.

I will never forgive Uvalde police.

When seconds count, they're an hour away

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 11 points 9 hours ago

Yeah but like... Weren't most of the kids brown-ish? /s

[–] FellowEnt@sh.itjust.works 14 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I was paid a dawn visit many years ago by an armed unit (UK). The way they ran it was two plainclothes (handguns only) officers knock on the door to assess the threat, with a van full of tooled up guys in balaclavas just outside, just in case. It was all very chill and no unnecessary stress/escalation for anyone. Seems like this would be a more sensible approach.

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 3 points 7 hours ago

It would indeed be a more sensible approach.

I'm frequently amazed that despite your countries declining standard of living it is still light years ahead of that of my own. I'm actually jealous. Please rejoin the EU as soon as it's convenient.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

That sounds very nice. I'm honestly jealous. However, there were 408 mass shootings in the USA last year. That's more than 110 people shot per day. While I in no way support the policies of the police in the USA, I do have to admit that given the likelihood that the residents of any particular home might be armed, I personally would not want to be a lightly armed and unarmored cop knocking on a door here. I mean, people here have literally been shot just for knocking or ringing a doorbell.

While all cops are indeed bastards, many of the other people in this country aren't any better. The left end of the bell curve in this country is very heavily armed and doing their part to help police turn the nation into the war zone they think it already is. Until common sense gun laws are passed and the dumbest and most violent among us are disarmed, it's not going to change for the better.

[–] FellowEnt@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Yeah I get it, it's a silly comparison as the potential threat landscape is completely different. It's a sad situation over there.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 4 points 7 hours ago

I wouldn't be surprised to see there is a episode of something where someone needs to do a crime in area so they pull this so all the cops are in other side of town.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 hours ago

I mean if they had been told there were gunshots, several dead in the street and hostages. That might be a fairly reasonable response.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 27 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Ok, so granny got swatted, why?

What was the police told about the situation?

Is there an article about this which explains the cause of this.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 53 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Those questions would only matter if this kind of police reaction wasn't almost exclusive to the US. So American police are idiots.

In Europe there were a few cases in France, but they led to changes in police procedures to verify reports more thoroughly before busting through doors.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 15 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

There are a lot of things that can be pointed at as to why this happens so much in the US. But I think most people forget that this is a problem that can literally be fixed using laws and technology.

Swatting can only happen because the US telecom system is so full of holes and because the US legal system isn't doing its job.

The primary thing you have to do is fix it so that the emergency operators can know where a call actually originated. And all we need to do to make that happen is to change the law so that telecom companies are held criminally and civilly liable when a person uses their infrastructure to fake where an emergency call is coming from.

Calls that come from foreign sources or from internet sources would harbor great suspicion. Imagine that the operator gets a big flashing notice that the call is suspicious right from the start.

I'm not saying that police and gun nuts and police gun nuts and incompetent police and nazi assholes don't have a lot of culpability, or that we shouldn't have severe penalties for people who do the swatting but the core fault lies in our elected representatives being too corrupt to hold telecom companies to account.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 9 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I don't think giving the police more surveillance options is the best option. The main problem is the extreme militarisation of the US police. This amount of force is a ridiculous response to almost any likely scenario they would have encountered.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 15 points 11 hours ago

That's not surveillance. That's basic service, allowing the recipient of a call to know who is actually calling them. The same thing would also stop a lot of scammers.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 9 hours ago

they also get alot of surplus equipment from the military that is outdated, which makes it even worst.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 12 points 11 hours ago

All cops are idiots.

"ACAI"???