this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
651 points (98.9% liked)

Greentext

8236 readers
644 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Telemachus93@slrpnk.net 43 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Of course it's work finding solutions to problems and you should be able to live off your work. And in capitalism, a patent sometimes is the only option to do so.

However, patents and other forms of "intellectual property" are absolutely illogical and amoral. Nobody ever made a completely new thing. Every innovation builds on so much knowledge accumulated by so many people that came before. It's absolutely nonsensical that an advancement that's 99 % an achievement of humanity and 1 % of a single person should belong to that single person.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip -3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I disagree, patents makes sense for normal citizens, it gives them a legal framework to fight against a company just taking the invention from them without compensation.

As for the 99% vs 1% contribution, remember that it is usually the last 1% of a project that consumes the most time.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 41 minutes ago

Normal citizens!? The cost of patent litigation can range from $2,000,000 to $4,000,000 on average per side.

I am sorry, but I have yet to meet a normal citizen that can afford a cost like this.

[–] Telemachus93@slrpnk.net 23 points 12 hours ago

That's a weak argument because everything used by normal citizens is, in practice, always used by the big corpos against the normal citizens in much greater quantity and with much more force.

Now that I think of it, it's no argument at all because I already admitted, that under capitalism, you might not have another choice to get paid for your work. That still doesn't make it morally good or logically sound.