this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
96 points (74.2% liked)

Greentext

8272 readers
794 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I don't know how Jewish it is, but it is part of a general trend of how society treats marriage.

Generations back, marriage was considered the beginning, a cornerstone for building an adult life on. Now, it's shifted more towards a capstone, a thing that you can add to your life once you get your shit together. That has shifted expectations in dating, as well as expectations of how independent young adults need to be.

And it has pushed back expectations of what it means to be ready to have children. And once a higher percentage of parents have more money when they have kids, it also subtly shifts the expectations of parenting, as well:

"Having kids is too expensive" is just the straight-up truth for anyone who isn't uncommonly comfortable relying on charity and/or society.

What's wrong with relying on society? Having a good family and social circle is basically the most important part of being ready to have kids. My wife and I waited till we were rich before having kids, but we still heavily rely on our family, friends, and neighbors to enrich our children's lives, while also being there for them and their children: rotating babysitting duties if some parents want to go on a date or even go out of town, rotating dinner hosting so only one family has to cook and clean, getting the kids together so that they can play and socialize, etc. We can't do the parenting thing in isolation, but I don't think society expects us to.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

because you shouldn't have to be rich af to have kids. or a house, or stable employment.

and yet, society is telling us that you will never have any of this, unless you were lucky enough to be born rich.

very few people will ever become rich.

i see this myself all the time. i date and i meet women who basically think you are a loser/undatable if you aren't millions in the bank, then whine people are 'lazy'. meanwhile they don't have millions in the bank, and are still having mommy and daddy pay their mortgage/rent in their frickin' 30s.

lady, i worked my ass off my entire life, why the hell would i ever want to date someone who is still dependent on their parents for basic adult costs?

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Having a good family and social circle is basically the most important part of being ready to have kids

Well, bad news for you there, too: since we're all busy working and commuting and moving states for jobs and our third places are disappearing for various reasons, because our connections have moved globally online instead of locally offline, we are all further away from our families of origin and have smaller social circles to help support our physical lives.

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Relying on society, when it works out, still usually leaves you with over-extended or strained relationships(especially with friends and family), and kids who will never understand just what was so important about their conceptions and births that couldn't have waited until you were a little more ready and not constantly stressed to the breaking point - kids who are absolutely right.

Ask me how I know. If I look at it from the stand-point of the heart-attack that seems due any day now, maybe there was some urgency, but without trying to shoe-horn kids into a lifestyle that wasn't ready for them and ultimately had to be abandoned in-favor of doing whatever it takes to keep them happy and healthy, external/internal consequences be damned, then my health outlook might not look so bleak.

All that, and have you seen divorce statistics? Jesus FUCK, have you SEEN divorce statistics? ... and it's somehow still okay to throw massive financial insecurity into the mix, the SINGLE GREATEST driver of divorce? Sure. Aim for the stars, kid. The world is your oyster and all that.

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Relying on society, when it works out, still usually leaves you with over-extended or strained relationships

No, framing that as the best case scenario is just a complete lack of imagination. I'm closer with my friends and family now because we have regular meetups and more scheduled social contact. The idea that this kind of stuff would strain my friendships is actually pretty foreign to me. We do things for each other, and that brings us closer rather than piling up one-way resentment for the people who give more than they get.

I find life to be less stressful when I'm around people I love. And that was always true, before I had kids, too.

All that, and have you seen divorce statistics. Jesus FUCK, have you SEEN divorce statistics?

Divorce rates have been dropping over the last 40 years, are especially low for college educated couples who got married after the age of 30.

Take a deep breath and realize that lots of people are living lots of different lives. Try to imagine that some of us are happy, too.

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

College educated couples who got married after the age of 30 are exactly the sort to buy a house before having kids. They'll also have locked-in friends and family who they can count-on, and likely owe them favors. Other than grandparents and single people, these ARE the society you want in your corner.

As someone who did it in the reverse order, I promise you, you're gonna burn a friendship or familial relation or three out of need, ones that otherwise would have lasted generations, and know as its happenning you'll be living with that regret the rest of your life. You may be able to pay them back, but almost certainly neither in-kind or in any way, or on any time-scale, that makes the relationship what it once was.

As you get older, relationships ossify - it takes life-changing events to have any chance to undo extinction events or straight "I'm burned-out on their shit".

So yeah, I have a lot of people who know that I, and my kids know, our family owes them and I will do anything in my power to do whatever I can to help them should they ever ask. They even would likely still help with whatever I asked for, even non-sense("we're square")...

... BUT, they stopped coming to fun "note-worthy" things we invite them to many years-ago. Any sharing in our modest successes(or just relief that x milestone was reached) is tainted by all the dirty-dirty of all the sausage they've helped us make to get to here.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I've been dumping friends the past few years. because they are indeed, ossifying into miserable old cunts. and i don't regard having a social life being worht the misery of listening to someone who is 34 rant on and on about how evil everything is like my parents did. it just sucks and i'd rather be alone doing something productive and interesting with my life.

and that doesn't include the people i've dropped one became conspiracy theorists, incredibly bitter, or just trapped in social media delusion alt reality... ugh. it's so miserable to be around people who just can't think of anyone/anything other than themselves. and as you age... damn that is what most people become, entirely selfish and self-absorbed.

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I'm talking about friends that are to be rightly missed. Still close-by and friendly, but not like it once was. Anyone remotely like you've described in my life moved-away or died. They rarely-offered and more importantly never-accepted help in the first-place.

I'm more afraid of being thought of as one of them than worried about bothering to ditch anyone like-so.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

You are one of them. To them at least.

As I age I find it incredibly awful/amazing how other people I meet now, basically lecture me about myself. Without knowing anything about me. They just make up a story in their head about me, and run with it.

Oftentimes they will straight up ignore what I have told them about myself, or twist it in these fantastical ways that are clearly projections and fantasies of their fears, but are likely them self-reporting about their own shame about themselves.

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 hours ago

Still better to not have to face it out-in-the-open this side of (recognized/recognizable)change for the better. Don't see where I said anything about you, but you didn't hold back about me, did you? Am I supposed to thank you?