this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
529 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

84940 readers
3619 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SillyDude@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I asked gpt5 and it told me to check the clutch safety switch. The thing you fixed.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago

Did it give a diagram and troubleshooting steps from the factory service manual too? This is all stuff you would typically find in forums. There's always some dealer tech around who can copy and paste from their service equpiment/library

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

5-10 years ago, you could be pretty sure this was a thing that actually needed checked, since the post about the clutch safety switch was posted by a real person who presumably had the same problem as you and fixed it with this method.

Now, there's no way to know if that's actually the case, or if "clutch safety switch" is just a likely string of words to feed someone who is having car trouble. You might get lucky, or you might get sent on eight consecutive goose chases because an LLM fundamentally doesn't know what factual knowledge is, it only knows how to reorder and regurgitate things that other people have said in other contexts.

[–] fta@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I agree with the larger point you’re making, but chatbots are getting better at referencing posts / websites from which they’re taking a solution.

That’s if and only if of course they used a web search tool to answer, and if that website is still alive — made less likely due to AI.

But for debugging something like this, it is actually helpful for now with citations enabled.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The problem is that right now would be the peak of this information being available. What are you going to find in 20 years when everyone has abandoned forums in favor of asking ChatGPT for all the answers? There would be nothing left to train the models on.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

I'm here now so me want thing now!

[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I tried giving minimal information and still got similar results.

When I think about what got worse about the internet, it's mostly the life stories before recipes, the novel length pages to maybe answer a simple question, and pretty much anything else related to SEO.

[–] sexhaver87@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Not the virtually endless large language model babble?

[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

That's what I was referring to by novel length pages. Feels like those predate the recent LLM stuff though.