this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
431 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

85136 readers
4002 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

FYI. Hydro power has similar capacity and start up times

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Yeah, the downside of hydro though is that you need to have a fitting space to build it. You can't just excavate a random field somewhere and plonk a hydro dam right there.

In most places all easy spots for hydro are already taken.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Not quite - only the biggest hydro stations can generate a gigawatt or more, and their startup time is like 10 minutes.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This project is only 500 MW here

https://www.pv-magazine.de/2024/09/20/flexbase-plant-500-megawatt-redox-flow-speicher-in-der-schweiz/

And other places say 800 MW

Both of which are comparable to large hydro.

Modern pumped hydro has a ramp up in the 10s of seconds range.

Anyway. Same ballpark in terms of power.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

I must have got the 1.2GW from some comment.