this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
422 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

85136 readers
4002 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 5 points 3 hours ago

this will be by far the largest vanadium flow battery in the world, especially outside china

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 14 points 9 hours ago
[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 36 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

The article doesn't explain the battery, making it a bullshit site if you ask me, here is what they are talking about:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanadium_redox_battery

'The vanadium redox battery (VRB), also known as the vanadium flow battery (VFB) or vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB), is a type of rechargeable flow battery which employs vanadium ions as charge carriers.[5] The battery uses vanadium's ability to exist in a solution in four different oxidation states to make a battery with a single electroactive element instead of two.[6]

For several reasons, including their relative bulkiness, vanadium batteries are typically used for grid energy storage, i.e., attached to power plants/electrical grids.[7] '

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 10 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

I don't think I understand any better what the battery is then I did before. As per usual Wikipedia sucks at explaining concepts that you don't actually already understand.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

source: wikipedia (link above)

As per usual Wikipedia sucks at explaining concepts that you don’t actually already understand.

but it's true, i have encountered exactly this phenomenon many times :/

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 14 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (3 children)

Here's the short version.

A normal battery is a sealed cell. It has a positive and negative electrode, with an electrolyte between them. Usually many layers of this. When you charge it, a chemical change happens. When you discharge it, that chemical change is undone.

A redox flow battery uses fixed electrodes, but a liquid electrolyte that can be pumped and stored. This means you can increase overall storage capacity simply by adding more electrolyte tanks, without needing more electrodes. Think of it like a generator with a bigger gas tank.

The whole vanadium thing is just one of the metals used in the battery. There's a few kind of redox flow batteries using different chemistries

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago

Also there are hundreds of chemical combinations that produce electricity that we know about, and only a handful have been worked on for batteries. As reported in Harper's Magazine many years back, that is not indexed to enshitified search engines, because fuck you (us, google, et al talking.)

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Fry: I get it! So if the simplified bucket explanation gets full, you just add more buckets!

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 1 points 5 hours ago

Yes exactly. If you need more total capacity you add more tanks, if you need more instantaneous output power you add more electrodes. And thus you can scale either one without messing with the other.

[–] jakobmn@feddit.dk 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Thank you! That is a smart solution to inrease capacity!

The downside is that does batteries are not be energy dense. Perfect for grid storage but useless for car batteries (where the bulk of battery R&D money goes).

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah wikipedia is hit or miss, especially as technical people like to show off their fancy words and explain things in ways only technical people understand.

But it's Vanadium, and you can look that up elsewhere. The first large industrial vanadium battery (if I recall,) was some years back, I think in WA State.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

If I really want to feel stupid, I go to the Wikipedia article for some simple maths concept I thought I understood

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 1 points 3 hours ago

oh yeah, i read up yesterday what a polynomial is. hah.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

Yeah I think people who enjoy math and formulas and proofs also enjoy writing Wikipedia articles in the same way. I usually go to the Simple English Wikipedia for any math topics. And I got as far as calc 2 in college, so I'm no ignoramus.

[–] Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago

If I heard this on a different situation I would have thought this is an AI hallucination.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 23 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (9 children)

The headline looks wrong, but it actually isn't.

The article specifies:

  • Total capacity: 2.1GWh
  • Peak output: 1.2GW
  • Ramp up time: a few milliseconds

That's what the "within milliseconds" in the title refers to.

Every power generator has a ramp up time. Think the time it takes to start the engine in a diesel generator, until it spins up and is able to output peak power.

Nuclear reactors can hare ramp-up times of hours, in some conditions even days.

This thing here can go from zero to peak output within almost no time, which makes it perfect to balance the sometimes erratic and unpredictable generation fluctuations of renewable energy production.

For comparison, coal or gas power generators usually have large flywheels that, once spinning, react almost instantly to power fluctuations in the network by converting their motion to electricity or the other way round. If these coal or gas generators aren't running, they can't be used to balance the fluctuations in the network, so battery solutions like the one in OP are required to actively manage the network stability.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Perfect power source for a Death Star! The planet goes from zero to smithereens in milliseconds!

[–] Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That's like a huge capacitor on my hobby electronics brain.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

That's pretty much the job, except a billion times as large.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

FYI. Hydro power has similar capacity and start up times

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, the downside of hydro though is that you need to have a fitting space to build it. You can't just excavate a random field somewhere and plonk a hydro dam right there.

In most places all easy spots for hydro are already taken.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Not quite - only the biggest hydro stations can generate a gigawatt or more, and their startup time is like 10 minutes.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

This project is only 500 MW here

https://www.pv-magazine.de/2024/09/20/flexbase-plant-500-megawatt-redox-flow-speicher-in-der-schweiz/

And other places say 800 MW

Both of which are comparable to large hydro.

Modern pumped hydro has a ramp up in the 10s of seconds range.

Anyway. Same ballpark in terms of power.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

I must have got the 1.2GW from some comment.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Imperious_melange@lemmy.world 35 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

I wanted to research it myself since I didn't know how Redbox flow batteries operate. It is two giant tanks of liquid energy. When there's extra electricity from wind or solar, pumps move special vanadium-based liquids through a stack of cells, storing that energy as a chemical change. When electricity is needed later, the process runs in reverse and the liquids generate power for the grid. Unlike lithium batteries, the energy is stored in the liquid tanks, so making the battery bigger is mostly a matter of building larger tanks. The Swiss project will store about 2.1 GWh of energy—enough to help balance renewable power on a massive scale—and was chosen partly because redox-flow batteries are non-flammable, long-lasting, and can be cycled tens of thousands of times with little degradation

[–] Orygin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago

I think that's the same kind of battery technology as explained in this video. Most certainly not the same chemistry used, but same in principle

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 20 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

We don't know soccer fields around these parts...

[–] AbsoluteAggressor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Anything but the Imperial System huh?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

It's 1,435 US rods square, or 1,333.6 imperial rods, simple.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›