this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
464 points (97.9% liked)

Games

16806 readers
907 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
464
Diablo 4's latest microtransaction controversy is a $30 portal recolor: "You can get Palworld for this price" (www.gamesradar.com)
submitted 9 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
119 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But I just don't see how the skins in these games bring joy anywhere near the money charged for them.

The simple answer is that, for a fair amount of people, $30 isn't a notable purchase, such that it's not particularly a substitute for anything else they may be interested in doing.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Is that true? Something like 40% of Americans don't have $400 on hand. Maybe the people spending money on this trend wealthier?

I feel like you'd have to be pretty wealthy for $30 to be unremarkable.

[–] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works -2 points 9 months ago

Maybe the people spending money on this trend wealthier?

I mean we're already looking at a fairly expensive hobby in gaming, which is going to skew towards people with more money in the first place.

And just speaking from my own perspective as solidly middle class, $30 is pretty comfortably within what I can spend without particularly thinking about it. Like yeah, I obviously can't just throw $30 at everything I see, it adds up over time, but it's low enough that I don't particularly have to think about exactly where it will come out of my budget.

And fwiw, I tend to avoid most in-game micro transactions, because I simply don't value them all that highly. I barely even care about getting free unlocks in most games.