this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
547 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

85297 readers
4389 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It feels like it needs to redefine a unit, not a base, same as with degrees that are base 10 but units are different so π is whole. I'm not sure if counting in different units has much use compared to counting in different base from a number theoretical perspective

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I think we're in agreement. I basically said there'd be no point unless for some reason you wanted to describe radians as whole numbers.

Otherwise, base~π~ doesn't make any sense, especially since there's no unambiguous way to define a constant interval between irrational integers (a contraction of terms, I know).

My main point was that there's no way to have a base~π~ numeral system, and even if you could it would have next to no practical value.