This is an interesting article, but I think that this standardisation is exactly for port being the same, not for pinning specific implementation of the 600+ pages long standard.
sukhmel
Wow what a marketing ~~scum~~ trick to show all compatible older generations as separate products
Maybe a rat brain project? I think the mapping of human may take longer, but yeah, once it happens interesting times are on the horizon
Also, maybe in a world where you measure anyone with money it makes sense to measure intelligence with money ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
A dog may be able to fully react and learn how to react with the exterior. But can it modify itself the way human brain can?
As per current psychology's view, yes, even if to a smaller extent. There are problems with how we define conscience, and right now with LLMs most of the arguments are usually related to the Chinese room and philosophical zombie thought experiments, imo
I'd say that difference between nature boiling down to maths and LLMs boiling down to maths is that in LLMs it's not the knowledge itself that is abstracted, it's language. This makes it both more believable to us humans, because we're wired to use language, and less suitable to actually achieve something, because it's just language all the way down.
Would be nice if it gets us something in the long run, but I wouldn't keep my hopes up
Not quite related to the topic, but I encountered several 'books' that can be replaced by several paragraphs of text, and this is almost as bad as making three hours video instruction where 30 seconds or a bit of text would suffice. I find it horrible that such ones are written at all
How lossy can it be until it's not infringement? One-line summary of some book is also a lossy reproduction
That's meat beans, maybe
Yeah, in case of polio and pox, there's no question of if it will be beneficial
A good link, maybe image may be harmful even if it's without context
Well, it's good that some justice was finally achieved, but that is depressing level of covering up (as usual)