sukhmel

joined 2 years ago
[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 7 points 6 months ago

The families of the divers eventually received compensation for the damages from the Norwegian government, 26 years after the incident.

Well, it's good that some justice was finally achieved, but that is depressing level of covering up (as usual)

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

This is an interesting article, but I think that this standardisation is exactly for port being the same, not for pinning specific implementation of the 600+ pages long standard.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 5 points 6 months ago

Wow what a marketing ~~scum~~ trick to show all compatible older generations as separate products

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Maybe a rat brain project? I think the mapping of human may take longer, but yeah, once it happens interesting times are on the horizon

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

Also, maybe in a world where you measure anyone with money it makes sense to measure intelligence with money ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

A dog may be able to fully react and learn how to react with the exterior. But can it modify itself the way human brain can?

As per current psychology's view, yes, even if to a smaller extent. There are problems with how we define conscience, and right now with LLMs most of the arguments are usually related to the Chinese room and philosophical zombie thought experiments, imo

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I'd say that difference between nature boiling down to maths and LLMs boiling down to maths is that in LLMs it's not the knowledge itself that is abstracted, it's language. This makes it both more believable to us humans, because we're wired to use language, and less suitable to actually achieve something, because it's just language all the way down.

Would be nice if it gets us something in the long run, but I wouldn't keep my hopes up

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

Not quite related to the topic, but I encountered several 'books' that can be replaced by several paragraphs of text, and this is almost as bad as making three hours video instruction where 30 seconds or a bit of text would suffice. I find it horrible that such ones are written at all

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

How lossy can it be until it's not infringement? One-line summary of some book is also a lossy reproduction

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago

That's meat beans, maybe

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 6 months ago

Yeah, in case of polio and pox, there's no question of if it will be beneficial

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago

A good link, maybe image may be harmful even if it's without context

view more: next ›