this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
220 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

85422 readers
4188 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] credo@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The math works out in the Drones’ favor I think. $25M/$35K -> a 1:714 ratio of helicopters to drones, on a dollar-to-dollar basis. So.. I’d say “by probability” instead.

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago (6 children)

This is the primary reason the us military budget should go from 1.5 trillion to 0.5 trillion. If we shifted to drone dominance the cost would go way down, we’d have a stronger military, and we could use that extra trillion to pay down debt, fund more healthcare, share profits with US citizens, the list of possible amazing things is huge.

Will we do this? Maybe eventually but not while we have big strong dumbass in charge.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

We’ll find a way to do it, but only at the expense of the middle class.

This is the primary reason the us military budget should go from 1.5 trillion to 0.~~5 trillion~~.

[–] belochka@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

If it took Russia so long with far smaller military budget, for USA it would take an existential war, so abundance of funds is sort of a defense social contract. Things cost 5x what they could, but they get designed, produced, procured, maintained and combined into a system.

Unless there's some political struggle where the old military industry supports one side and the other needs a new military.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 3 days ago

Will we do this? Maybe eventually but not while we have big strong dumbass billionaire business titans in charge.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago

World needs less weapons, not more, cheaper ones (making human life even cheaper). Find a better list (healthcare is fine, like civilized countries have). Maybe some soft power helping others, oh, wait, mad king....

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

We just need an alternate industrial base real quick.