this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
563 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

85540 readers
3712 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] adarza@piefed.ca 69 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"autopilot" shouldn't even be used on a narrow residential street like that.

[–] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Putting the company aside for a second, genuinely why? Low speed residential, especially narrow or precision driving should be bread and butter tier 2 autonomous driving, right under tier 1 = highway, and quite a lot over the complexities of mixed use areas at higher speed. Unless you specifically meant their Tesla autopilot and not the concept as a whole with it in quotes.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Autonomous vehicles have been known to run over and through quite a few things. In an area where a bunch of kids are likely to be playing is a bad place for such a technology IMO.

[–] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

But so do people so we have to consider the statistics. I just think if this goes anywhere, low speed precision should be it's bread and butter scenario.