this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
52 points (90.6% liked)

Games

16796 readers
850 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Nitter link: https://twiiit.com/SteamDB/status/1758930895388463612 (Now fixed!) Might have to use this link multiple times to find a instance that isn’t rate limited or check the wiki and change the url manually.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Do we need these posts for every game that releases? Just curious.

Edit: seems others are actually interested. Fair enough.

[–] Chozo@kbin.social 9 points 9 months ago

Huge concurrent player counts like this are pretty significant milestones that not every game hits. The popularity of this game, which seems to me like it had hardly any marketing campaign behind it, is pretty noteworthy.

[–] JowlesMcGee@kbin.social 7 points 9 months ago

I find it interesting, especially for games from smaller teams. But I suppose that don't really add anything to the larger conversation. I just find it interesting to hear how some of these games are doing.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

I think the difference is that in this case nobody really expected it to hit that big. The developers definitely didn't expect so many players, they've scaled up services, turned off auxiliary features to reduce load and still yesterday the player count was so high that at peak you couldn't even log in. It's a game suffering literally from success.