this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
138 points (90.6% liked)

Technology

59569 readers
3431 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
138
Someone had to say it: Scientists propose AI apocalypse kill switches (www.theregister.com)
submitted 9 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Someone had to say it: Scientists propose AI apocalypse kill switches::Better visibility and performance caps would be good for regulation too

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I think p.much everyone should watch his catalogue, but all things considered I'd still prefer to have kill switches even though they're useless even in most instances you want to use them. Not because it'd do any good, but because I'm an anxious person and having a big red "shit's fucked" button puts me at ease.