I don't understand how those two things are distinct.
Leate_Wonceslace
joined 1 year ago
You understand that arguments about the legitimacy of law is an argument about whether a law should exist rather than if a law does exist, right?
There's a difference between saying that someone's "in the right" (which they're absolutely not) and saying someone is legally capable of doing what they want. (which is debatable)
There's no such thing as being too based.
IP law is an illegitimate institution, so no they're absolutely not.
It's election day, so they've probably been relegated to other projects, since they won't be able to make a difference anymore.
Are you able to drive? Do you understand the difference between tactile controls and touch screens?
That toaster is remarkably consistent.
When the slop is actually just poison.
Yes; "Luce" is Italian for "Light' and "Lucifer" is Latin for "light bearer". They are cognates.
Is this a ploy to bankrupt the company?
view more: next βΊ
π€·ββοΈ I only use local generators at this point,so I don't care.